Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 9:24*pm, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:12:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On May 17, 9:01*pm, DK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 20:51:08 -0400, DK wrote: HK wrote: wrote: I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to question the character of folks who have stood back and not said anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like another pet peeve of mine ![]() When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them. In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock. The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they applied to you. Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules. It is unfortunate to a certain degree. *You would have been banned a long time ago. If it's any consolation, JimH is sending me personal messages (in Chuck's Place) telling me what a bad boy I am. Post them here. *The three amigos/douche bags an not immune to responsibility for their lame actions.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Naw, we should just let it die now that my observations and opinions have been pretty much confirmed.. Anyway, back to the nice wreckedboats we were enjoying before I read that thread.... You are, of course, correct. All of this is not helping either group (especially this one), and I'm not very innocent! -- John *H*- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I logged into the group tonight to see how it was all handled there. My post was of course gone, but the namecalling and such that followed, directed at us/me continues still.. My friends would have never stood for that, I am learning quite a lot here about them. All in all I guess it has been good in a way.. Although I did loose a decent sailboat over it all...;( |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 10:28*pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You need some new material... |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message .... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention, you are over there in your troll thread, lying about circumstances and situations over here, you are dismissed Harry, plonk |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I plonked him months ago... what took you so long. ;-)
I go over *there* for giggles... that thread is a crack-up. --Mike wrote in message ... On May 17, 11:11 pm, HK wrote: wrote: On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote: wrote in message ... On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady) wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote: [Snippo] That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the ****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel and be quiet. Casady On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry to have wasted your bandwidth.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------**-------------------- I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good and interesting contributions to make. I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep lately. I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all. Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just with Chuck and Harry running the show ![]() ![]() For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they might just be stuck here with us too ![]() with boatshoes ![]() Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working out, is it wet yet this year? By for now.. D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who read the rules, signed up and post. You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your account. Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than rationalization. There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days. Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not to mention, you are over there in your troll thread, lying about circumstances and situations over here, you are dismissed Harry, plonk |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
because I can avoid even *seeing* posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical comments about computer operating systems snip You forgot to include incessant political trolling, didn't you? Just a tinge of hypocrisy, eh? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BANNED FROM VIRGIN ! | ASA | |||
Ted Bell banned! | ASA | |||
You've banned Vegemite!? | ASA | |||
You've banned Vegemite!? | ASA |