On May 17, 9:09*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"DK" wrote in message

...





John H. wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 20:51:08 -0400, DK wrote:

HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine

When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.

In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.

The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.

Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. *You would have been banned a
long time ago.

If it's any consolation, JimH is sending me personal messages (in Chuck's
Place) telling me what a bad boy I am.

Post them here. *The three amigos/douche bags an not immune to
responsibility for their lame actions.

JohnH has a habit of posting personal messages (note the word personal) sent
to him on this NG.

In this case I have no problem with him doing so................post away
Herring.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jim,this place is a pile of ****, remember? What are you doing here?
Go back to Chuck's where he'll allow you to call people names if he
likes you......

On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

....
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:

On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
[Snippo]
That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.
Casady
On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....

---------------------------------------------------------------------------**--------------------

I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good
and interesting contributions to make.
I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep
lately.

I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where
everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have
started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has
been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not
someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all.
Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet
policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count
as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where
posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave
the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A
quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of
back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard
insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just
with Chuck and Harry running the show * * *now that is scarey...

For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check
out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would
stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they
might just be stuck here with us too I swear it has something to do
with boatshoes

Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working
out, is it wet yet this year?

By for now..

D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who
read the rules, signed up and post.

You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but
because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed
to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your
account.

Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than
rationalization.

There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other
place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of
interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing*
posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar
playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical
comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam
and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days.

Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I
just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it?

On May 18, 9:42*am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

yada yada yada yada

You got banned because you broke the rules and virtually asked to be
banned.

There's nothing more to it, no matter how many times you try to
rationalize it.

Go back to licking boat shoes.. I think someone stepped in seagull
poo, "over there"...

On May 18, 9:14*am, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:25:10 -0700 (PDT), BTW, I received five messages
from JimH, all telling me I was a sick
individual because I said something negative about the way Chuck handled
people like Harry and the problems between the two groups.
John *H*
Even Outlook Express can deal with unwanted emails. How did he get your
addy. anyway? I noticed that you flub it in your headers.

( The following is not specifically aimed at John)
It will not do any good to grouse about anything that goes on at Chuck's
group. If it upsets you, don't read it. The two groups can coexist
peacefully if they leave us alone and we do the same for them. There's only
a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out of
their mouths. Filter them and their whining won't bother you.

A personal message can be sent in Chuck's Place without an email address..
One just clicks on a name and their profile page pops up with a link to
sending a personal message.

You've sent me a couple there, and they end up in the same place the
emails you've sent me recently...in the garbage disposal.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You've emailed me with nothing but flames, Harry.

On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:58:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 18, 9:14*am, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:25:10 -0700 (PDT), BTW, I received five messages
from JimH, all telling me I was a sick
individual because I said something negative about the way Chuck handled
people like Harry and the problems between the two groups.
John *H*
Even Outlook Express can deal with unwanted emails. How did he get your
addy. anyway? I noticed that you flub it in your headers.

( The following is not specifically aimed at John)
It will not do any good to grouse about anything that goes on at Chuck's
group. If it upsets you, don't read it. The two groups can coexist
peacefully if they leave us alone and we do the same for them. There's only
a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out of
their mouths. Filter them and their whining won't bother you.

A personal message can be sent in Chuck's Place without an email address.
One just clicks on a name and their profile page pops up with a link to
sending a personal message.

You've sent me a couple there, and they end up in the same place the
emails you've sent me recently...in the garbage disposal.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You've emailed me with nothing but flames, Harry.

FWIW, I've gotten three messages from Harry. JimH has been kind enough to
send ten.

Harry's integrity is showing through again.
--
John *H*

wrote:
On May 18, 9:42 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...
yada yada yada yada

You got banned because you broke the rules and virtually asked to be
banned.

There's nothing more to it, no matter how many times you try to
rationalize it.

Go back to licking boat shoes.. I think someone stepped in seagull
poo, "over there"...


You got banned because you broke the rules. But feel free to rationalize
ad infinitum.

On May 18, 9:55*am, wrote:
On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:





wrote:
On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

....
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:

On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
[Snippo]
That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.
Casady
On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....

---------------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------

I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good
and interesting contributions to make.
I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep
lately.

I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where
everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have
started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has
been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not
someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all.
Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet
policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count
as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where
posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave
the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A
quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of
back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard
insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just
with Chuck and Harry running the show * * *now that is scarey....

For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check
out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would
stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they
might just be stuck here with us too I swear it has something to do
with boatshoes

Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working
out, is it wet yet this year?

By for now..

D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who
read the rules, signed up and post.

You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but
because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed
to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your
account.

Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than
rationalization.

There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other
place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of
interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing*
posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar
playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical
comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam
and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days.

Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I
just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Loogie, check this out.. since we are far from boating, I am going
to hijack this thread.. If it doesn't go my way, I will continue to
post until it does Let it die now, check out my very lame startup
website for our new line of pitwear

http://www.rowdymouse.com

Like I said before. Sorry to my friends here who know my history with
boats, and those who don't. But I have left the boat in the garage so
far this year. Any parent who has a 14 yo kid that is willing to spend
a weekend with dad will understand my sharp turn to other outdoor
activity.. However, she does really enjoy evenings on the lake with
her friends so it should be out soon. When it is, I promise more
boating photos and posts...Scotty, smallboats.com for anyone who does
not already know... yes, I am actually a boater, sometimes...

On May 18, 10:31*am, wrote:
On May 18, 9:55*am, wrote:





On May 17, 11:11*pm, HK wrote:

wrote:
On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:

On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
[Snippo]
That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.
Casady
On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....

---------------------------------------------------------------------------****--------------------

I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good
and interesting contributions to make.
I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep
lately.

I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where
everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have
started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has
been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not
someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all.
Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet
policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count
as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where
posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave
the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A
quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of
back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard
insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just
with Chuck and Harry running the show * * *now that is scarey...

For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check
out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would
stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they
might just be stuck here with us too I swear it has something to do
with boatshoes

Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working
out, is it wet yet this year?

By for now..

D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who
read the rules, signed up and post.

You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but
because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed
to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your
account.

Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than
rationalization.

There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other
place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of
interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing*
posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar
playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical
comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam
and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days.

Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I
just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Go away.... NOT ONE PERSON HERE WANTS YOU TO COME BACK, get it?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey Loogie, check this out.. since we are far from boating, I am going
to hijack this thread.. If it doesn't go my way, I will continue to
post until it does Let it die now, check out my very lame startup
website for our new line of pitwear

http://www.rowdymouse.com

Like I said before. Sorry to my friends here who know my history with
boats, and those who don't. But I have left the boat in the garage so
far this year. Any parent who has a 14 yo kid that is willing to spend
a weekend with dad will understand my sharp turn to other outdoor
activity.. However, she does really enjoy evenings on the lake with
her friends so it should be out soon. When it is, I promise more
boating photos and posts...Scotty, smallboats.com *for anyone who does
not already know... yes, I am actually a boater, sometimes...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Good stuff! My son and I went to a local pond yesterday and got some
worms wet.
I like the rowdy mouse, he's cool. I want a t-shirt!!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:58:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 18, 9:14 am, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:28:01 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 17 May 2008 19:25:10 -0700 (PDT), BTW, I received five
messages
from JimH, all telling me I was a sick
individual because I said something negative about the way Chuck
handled
people like Harry and the problems between the two groups.
John *H*
Even Outlook Express can deal with unwanted emails. How did he get
your
addy. anyway? I noticed that you flub it in your headers.

( The following is not specifically aimed at John)
It will not do any good to grouse about anything that goes on at
Chuck's
group. If it upsets you, don't read it. The two groups can coexist
peacefully if they leave us alone and we do the same for them.
There's only
a few babies over there that act as if we've ripped their bottles out
of
their mouths. Filter them and their whining won't bother you.

A personal message can be sent in Chuck's Place without an email
address.
One just clicks on a name and their profile page pops up with a link
to
sending a personal message.

You've sent me a couple there, and they end up in the same place the
emails you've sent me recently...in the garbage disposal.- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

You've emailed me with nothing but flames, Harry.

FWIW, I've gotten three messages from Harry. JimH has been kind enough to
send ten.

Harry's integrity is showing through again.
--
John *H*
C'mon John,
You are allowing them to get to you. The best way to frustrate H and his
butt lickers is to ignore them.

On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Finally, give it a rest. *If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...

Have it your way Zorro.