WaIIy wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:46:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On May 17, 12:46 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.

In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking is
not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general, really
obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the simple
rules of the household, you should either not visit or you should expect
to be escorted to the door or the dock.

The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.

Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
Harry, if you don't like rec.boats, why in hell are you here? Go away
and stay away. If you notice, the group is alot better without you and
JimH. Not one single person here misses you.

His psychiatrist wife could tell you.

They have a symbiotic, rather unsettling narcissistic relationship.


Wally and Loogy: dumb and dumber(er) :}

JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.

In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.

The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.

Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.

This thread is hysterical!

Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.

Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.



Nice try, Warp17, but you have now been caught in a lie.

On May 19, 7:53 pm, John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.

JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing
provocative therein:
***********************************
Some more advice
" Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm "

Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it
will stop.

Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and
knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to
your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away
from rec.boats. How nice of you.

Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his
intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful
members.

This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not
meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I
trust you will respect that intention on my part.

Have a nice evening.
Jim
********************************************

JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the
first PM!):

********************************************
(No Subject)
" Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm

Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's.

If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to
the forum.......my standards are higher.

Have a spectacular night dummy.
*****************************************

JimH has not changed.
--
John *H*

It was not a welcome message.

Got it.

You gave me permission to repost your PM's to me. Do you want me to
repost them (all made prior to the ones you just posted and directly
relating to my previous message)?

In your latest PM (yet another inflammatory one) you said you will no
longer respond to my posts or PM's. Knowing you and your integrity I
knew you would break that promise. ;-)

What exactly is your problem John?

JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:18 pm, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:48:08 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

"DK" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
"DK" wrote in message
...
HK wrote:
wrote:
I have now been banned from the other group after one post, asking why
a thread trashing us had been allowed to go on for days while the
thread origionator was also over here calling us names. Remember, this
is the same monitor that asked me not to mention "other groups" (not
even by name) here in our forum.. I have to admit, I am pretty ****ed
off and especially dissappointed in all those folks I thought were
friends who seem to have thrown me under the bus as it were. I have to
question the character of folks who have stood back and not said
anything when they can not be missing the hyprocracy, kind of like
another pet peeve of mine
When you are an adult and a guest in someone else's house and there are
rules posted, it pays to pay attention to them.
In my house or on my boats, no smoking is allowed, excessive drinking
is not allowed, use of illegal drugs is not allowed, and in general,
really obnoxious behavior is not allowed. If you cannot live by the
simple rules of the household, you should either not visit or you
should expect to be escorted to the door or the dock.
The proprietor of "the other group" has simple rules posted, and he has
repeated them in several forums. You apparently did not believe they
applied to you.
Unfortunately, "rec.boats" has no rules.
It is unfortunate to a certain degree. You would have been banned a
long time ago.
This thread is hysterical!
Pass the popcorn please.
I saw today that a moderator from another group you visit outed you as the
group "whiner". Complaining to someone about what you read here is very
sad, Jim.
Nice try Dan. But as usual, you are wrong again.
As a matter of fact, he's not. You whined to Chuck about getting personal
messages from me, and then you sent five more calling me names in each one.

If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.

BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*

More name calling. This is the place known for it.

Since you and several others want to make this public, let's set the
record straight............

You sent me derogatory PM after PM. I asked you to stop. You did
not. Thus the message to Chuck asking you to stop.

My initial PM to you and your reply to me the other night, after you
flamed Chuck and his board here, was:

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/6...board04oe2.jpg

3 more exchanges took place. You have my permission to post them.

Got it?


You are scary when you say "Got it?". Those are tough-guy words.

So you have 16 PMs in a new group with 38 members? Looks like a
conspiracy of circle jerks to me.

JimH wrote:
On May 18, 8:47 pm, "Jim" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

...

(Whining of the pathetic babies snipped)

If you'd like, I'll get a petition going to name you co-moderator in
Chuck's Place.
BTW, what's the deal with the neurosyphilis diagnosis? Was that just a
rumor? Hope so. That's some bad ****.
--
John *H*
They are whining for attention, John. And you are giving them what they
want.
Please stop. No one here needs to be reminded of the trio's shortcomings.
Appreciate it. :-)

Another moderator. I think this place clearly has the other place
beat as I now count 5 moderators here vs. 1 *there*.

The name calling here also outnumbers the *other* place by a count of
50-0.

You win. ;-)

Great! Don't let the door hit you in the ass, Warp17!

wrote:
On May 18, 7:37 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On May 17, 11:11 pm, HK wrote:
wrote:
On May 17, 10:28 pm, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message
.....
On May 17, 6:22 pm, (Richard Casady)
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 09:06:49 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
[Snippo]
That's tough **** and you will get no sympathy at wreckboats. We all
know you richly deserved it. We can always tell by the whining, the
****ing and the moaning. If you can't take a joke carry a crying towel
and be quiet.
Casady
On the contrary. Several here on and off line get the point. Argueably
it is a valid point to any thinking observer of the cast of characters
who has been here (wrecked boats) as long as you have, even if they
don't agree with me. Your disagreement, or failure to understand my
point of view, does not make it any less valid. But you can slap me
around here a little if it makes you feel good... don't remember ever
taking a cheap shot at you, but maybe I did. Anyway, you go boy, sorry
to have wasted your bandwidth....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------
I'm sorry you got into this situation Scotty, as I always felt you had good
and interesting contributions to make.
I hope you aren't being influenced and thus judged by the 'company' you keep
lately.
I am being judged because I won't hold my nose just to be where
everyone else is. Any one of a hundred other posters here could have
started a group and I would have been on board, but anybody who has
been here as long as I know that inevedibly this new "monitor" is not
someone known for having the capacity to be "moderate" at all.
Certainly I have personally been victim to his selective internet
policing here at rec.boats more times over the years than I can count
as have many of you. If you want to participate in a group where
posters are subject to selective enforcement, so be it. I will leave
the name calling to them. That is all that is left of me over there. A
quick visit tells me that although my post is gone, the pigpile of
back pats continues, with the final post coming down to the standard
insults focused on my grammar and spelling. Same old, same old.. Just
with Chuck and Harry running the show now that is scarey....
For those of us who are still here, you should go over and just check
out the roster and some of the posters who you never thought would
stand for all of that. At the same time, if they really got it, they
might just be stuck here with us too I swear it has something to do
with boatshoes
Good to see you checking in though, how is that little Skiff working
out, is it wet yet this year?
By for now..
D'oh. I'm not running anything at the other place. I'm just someone who
read the rules, signed up and post.
You were "judged" not for the excuses you are offering up here, but
because your post went way over the line, violated the rules you agreed
to abide by and because you taunted the moderator into killfiling your
account.
Everything you have posted about the incident is nothing more than
rationalization.
There are many reasons why some posters find the atmosphere at the other
place more pleasant than it is here. I like it because photos of
interest can be posted directly, and because I can avoid even *seeing*
posts relating to other peoples' grandchildren, bad amateur guitar
playing, diaperboat cruises, home-brewed beer, NASCAR, nonsensical
comments about computer operating systems, and the rest of the flotsam
and jetsam that passes for "rec.boats" these days.
Hey...this is *your* newsgroup and the newsgroup of your buddies here. I
just pop in on occasion for the giggles.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You need some new material...
Agreed. Harry was/is the king of "nonsensical comments about computer
operating systems". Now it's taboo?

Let's not forget his driveway, new septic tank (we know why THAT had to
be replaced), his office/kitchenette, office chair, etc...............

What a piece of work.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Everything except a 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat!

He's been quiet on that for a while. The only "reference" is the plural
use of the word boat.

Charlie wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


Finally, give it a rest. If you have a need to start a fight over
some silly thing or another, just drop me an email and I'll come back
in a different quise and give you a run for your money.

Again, you miss the point. We were here nicely minding our own
business. Chuck asked me not to mention other groups here and I
accomodated him here. Then Harry comes over here calling us names, we
still stay out of it.. then I go to Chuckies and find a whole thread
directed toward us being allowed to thrive there, full of lies and
misrepresentations. I asked a question to Chuckie as to how it could
stand, and he binned my post, allowed the pigpile to continue anyway,
and even joined in himself with his same old same old insults of his
own... You can have it, you can justify it any way you want.. The guy
is unfair and you not only know it, but obviously accept it with held
nose.. good for you...


Have it your way Zorro.

The problem with shortpants, as nice a guy as he seems, is that he was
an enabler of krause's nasty behavior for a long, long time, until,
until, krause finally ****ed *him* off and then shortpants called him a
nasty name.

In other words, it ain't so until I say it's so, because I'm a nice guy.

It's no different now that he's at another place making excuses again.

-- Charlie

Let's not forget the days when HK and JimH were bitter enemies. I guess
when two schoolyard punks get their asses kicked enough, they learn to
form a little gang. Add the Canadian and the Three Stooges were born.

On May 19, 7:53 pm, John H. wrote:
This is it - no more of the JimH bull****.

JimH's first message to me - a 'welcome' message, I guess with nothing
provocative therein:
***********************************
Some more advice
" Message sent on May 3, 2008, 6:10pm "

Stop insulting and flaming former members who left your NG and maybe it
will stop.

Admit to it or not, rec.boats is a joke. Most all productive and
knowledgeable members have migrated to Chucks forum and no longer post to
your place. Just today told one of them (Gene) that he should stay away
from rec.boats. How nice of you.

Yesterday DK trolled for a fight here. The members here realized his
intentions and basically ignored him. He is one of your rec.boats faithful
members.

This is a "Private Message" to you meaning it is between you and me and not
meant to be shared. I am trying to get this issue settled mano-amano. I
trust you will respect that intention on my part.

Have a nice evening.
Jim
********************************************

JimH's message politely asking me to not PM him. (Note that he sent the
first PM!):

********************************************
(No Subject)
" Message sent on May 4, 2008, 6:59pm

Hey dummy.......stop sending me PM's.

If I had you type of character I would post your "Private" Message to me to
the forum.......my standards are higher.

Have a spectacular night dummy.
*****************************************

JimH has not changed.
--
John *H*

Thanks for making my point.

BTW: You forgot to post your PM to me yesterday:

===========================

"Do you get a lot of satisfaction out of becoming the sniveling liar
your hero has been for ages? Keep working on it.

BTW, any further from you will be ignored. Here and there.

Got it, Dipnuts?"

===========================


Drop it already John.

59th request.

JimH wrote:


After asking him to stop PM'ing me after receiving a couple of
unprovoked flaming and derogatory PM's from him, and with him
continuing to do so (I believe he sent 3 more), I had to ask for an
intervention.

The truth comes out and it is so reminiscent of grade school. He
obliviously can't ignore and delete a PM so he has to bitch about it.

I wonder if the folks at oh.rr get the same whining messages from this
"adult"?

JimH wrote:


BTW: He sent me yet another one yesterday.

Have you tried your Mommy? Maybe she cares.