Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:29:22 +0000, Larry wrote: HK wrote in news:6ejf6eF67ovaU1 @mid.individual.net: They wouldn't have it any other way.... Crowd Control! Love it. No waterskiiers, for long anyways, in the stump fields! Matter of fact, stump fields even solve the problem of drunken fishermen in 500hp bassboats, not a bad thing at all! You can easily drive through the stump field with your 3hp little kicker without some redneck in his $45,000 bassboat waking you.... You just made Tom's day, I'm sure. --Vic I don't think Tom drinks. :) |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:52:19 -0400, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:29:22 +0000, Larry wrote: HK wrote in news:6ejf6eF67ovaU1 @mid.individual.net: They wouldn't have it any other way.... Crowd Control! Love it. No waterskiiers, for long anyways, in the stump fields! Matter of fact, stump fields even solve the problem of drunken fishermen in 500hp bassboats, not a bad thing at all! You can easily drive through the stump field with your 3hp little kicker without some redneck in his $45,000 bassboat waking you.... You just made Tom's day, I'm sure. --Vic I don't think Tom drinks. :) Er.... yeah. The boat part, just the boat part. --Vic |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:52:19 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:29:22 +0000, Larry wrote: HK wrote in news:6ejf6eF67ovaU1 @mid.individual.net: They wouldn't have it any other way.... Crowd Control! Love it. No waterskiiers, for long anyways, in the stump fields! Matter of fact, stump fields even solve the problem of drunken fishermen in 500hp bassboats, not a bad thing at all! You can easily drive through the stump field with your 3hp little kicker without some redneck in his $45,000 bassboat waking you.... You just made Tom's day, I'm sure. --Vic I don't think Tom drinks. :) Er.... yeah. The boat part, just the boat part. --Vic I wouldn't wish that on tom, but if it did happen, it would be fun to read his prose description of it here... :) |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 21, 1:36*pm, HK wrote:
Larry wrote: HK wrote in news:6ejf6eF67ovaU1 @mid.individual.net: They wouldn't have it any other way.... Crowd Control! Love it. No waterskiiers, for long anyways, in the stump fields! *Matter of fact, stump fields even solve the problem of drunken fishermen in 500hp bassboats, not a bad thing at all! You can easily drive through the stump field with your 3hp little kicker without some redneck in his $45,000 bassboat waking you.... I've never figured out why anyone not competing in a big money tourney would want a 70 mph bassboat.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because some people actually enjoy speed. What I can't figure out, is why someone would lie about just about everything they own, including 36'Zimmerman-like lobster boats. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:02:15 -0400, HK wrote:
Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:52:19 -0400, HK wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:29:22 +0000, Larry wrote: HK wrote in news:6ejf6eF67ovaU1 @mid.individual.net: They wouldn't have it any other way.... Crowd Control! Love it. No waterskiiers, for long anyways, in the stump fields! Matter of fact, stump fields even solve the problem of drunken fishermen in 500hp bassboats, not a bad thing at all! You can easily drive through the stump field with your 3hp little kicker without some redneck in his $45,000 bassboat waking you.... You just made Tom's day, I'm sure. --Vic I don't think Tom drinks. :) Er.... yeah. The boat part, just the boat part. --Vic I wouldn't wish that on tom, but if it did happen, it would be fun to read his prose description of it here... :) I'm afraid there has been a misunderstanding. Consider everything I said today, and yesterday just in case, retracted. We can now consider this matter closed. --Vic |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:08:53 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: Well, after 17 hours, $475 worth of gas, having to buy a small rain forest to make up for all the expelled carbon, we're comfortably ensconsed in Lexington, SC after a 17 hour ride dragging my Ranger down the inland route. Now, on to two weeks of fishing, fishing and more fishing. Plus the occasional side trip to keep SWMBO happy. Note to all drivers in Virginia - past, present and future. YOU SUCK!!! I'm glad you said 'drivers in Virginia', which includes all the damn Yankees, and not 'Virginia drivers'. Virginia is bad between DC and Richmond. Those of us who live here wish you folks would take I-81 or HWY 301 through MD. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:36:39 -0400, HK wrote:
I've never figured out why anyone not competing in a big money tourney would want a 70 mph bassboat. Maybe because all the big money tournament fishermen have them. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:07:06 -0400, HK wrote:
wrote: On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:36:39 -0400, HK wrote: I've never figured out why anyone not competing in a big money tourney would want a 70 mph bassboat. Maybe because all the big money tournament fishermen have them. To impress the bass? Hey, my best fishing is done from a canoe or wading, but then, we don't have much big water around here. 70 MPH in a boat, might be a little too thrilling for me, but whatever floats their boat. It's my understanding, 70 is a little on the slow side these days with bass boats breaking the century mark. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dinner has arrived | General | |||
The Troll has arrived | General | |||
The Halman has arrived... | General | |||
OT package arrived | General | |||
This arrived in my inbox! | ASA |