Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:58 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! Many modern sailboats have an open transom. It's quite safe. In fact, in some regards, it's considerably safer. Heck, my antique wooden Flying Dutchman didn't have a closed transom. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 19, 3:42 pm, hk wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:58 -0400, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! Many modern sailboats have an open transom. It's quite safe. In fact, in some regards, it's considerably safer. Heck, my antique wooden Flying Dutchman didn't have a closed transom. Herring knows less about boats than I do about shortwave radio, and I know absolutely nothing about shortwave radio. He's apparently never been on or even seen a transomless racing sail boat. That's probably because there are cobwebs under the boat trailer in his driveway, and he's never out on the water. You still have the FD? My memory of the class boat was that it had a closed transom, with big flaps that opened to let the water out. Or maybe they were just big square holes in the transom. Been a long time. OK, open transom or large scuppers? Which should it be? I wonder how many "offshore boats" really are self righting? The available info on keeping the sea out vs getting green water out seems contradictory so much that it seems that "offshore" means what ever the manufacturer says it means. Kevin Beddoe has a place ont he FishyFish site where he discusses taking a boat "Madelisa", almost identical to mine 85 miles off Cabo in Baja. Are conditions off Cabo better or worse than early summer in S. FL? From the pics, "Madelisa" has a deck but no scuppers at all. He then describes his deck as not even being sealed. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:25:00 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:58 -0400, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! Many modern sailboats have an open transom. It's quite safe. In fact, in some regards, it's considerably safer. Heck, my antique wooden Flying Dutchman didn't have a closed transom. Well, that's true. I wonder, though, if the sailboat with the open transoms are designed somewhat differently than your basic center console 21'er. -- ** Good Day! ** John H |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() is in re-runs. Eisboch |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:42:17 -0400, hk wrote:
wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:58 -0400, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! Many modern sailboats have an open transom. It's quite safe. In fact, in some regards, it's considerably safer. Heck, my antique wooden Flying Dutchman didn't have a closed transom. Herring knows less about boats than I do about shortwave radio, and I know absolutely nothing about shortwave radio. He's apparently never been on or even seen a transomless racing sail boat. That's probably because there are cobwebs under the boat trailer in his driveway, and he's never out on the water. You still have the FD? My memory of the class boat was that it had a closed transom, with big flaps that opened to let the water out. Or maybe they were just big square holes in the transom. Been a long time. The flying dutchman is long gone. Bought it in extremely poor condition for (I think) $150 when I was a teenager. It's racing days were obviously over, and it was probably ready for the landfill when I got it. The FD had so many lines it looked like a spaghetti factory. In this case, due to my limited budget, most of those lines were of the clothesline variety. The transom, I had to replace with a plywood facimile cut out with a jig saw. Two large holes with about an inch or two of material surrounding them, and a wider section down the center for the gudgeons. On one of the earliest sails, I thought it would be cool to try out the trapeze. Probably should have inspected it first. We were gong along at a pretty good clip when there was a loud TWANG, and I was in the water. Took my buddy (who narrowly avoided a capsize when I went over) a bit of an effort to get the boat turned around to come back and get me. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 19, 4:29 pm, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:25:00 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:58 -0400, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! Many modern sailboats have an open transom. It's quite safe. In fact, in some regards, it's considerably safer. Heck, my antique wooden Flying Dutchman didn't have a closed transom. Well, that's true. I wonder, though, if the sailboat with the open transoms are designed somewhat differently than your basic center console 21'er. -- ** Good Day! ** John H On the other Tolman forum, there is a discussion of cockpit drainage and somebody calculates that 2 5" diameter ports (two five inch diameter) would drain a 7'X7' X12" volume in about 52 seconds and this seems very long. Pasco and others discuss open transom boats, even with sealed decks as being dangerous if they are disabled because they can then be filled from astern. Even if not disabled they can be filled from astern. So, what is the correct philosophy on cockpit drainage? Do we put our effort into keeping the water out thus minimizing drainage area or try to allow the water to drain very fast but make us susceptible to waves from astern? |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Aug 19, 3:42 pm, hk wrote: wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:00:58 -0400, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:58:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... OK, lets try for some real info this time and no insults. Do so- called offshore boats really have good scuppers? Can anybody provide a link to a pic of such? Next, areas below the deck, are they sealed on offshore boats or accessible via a hatch? How much do said hatches leak? (my sealed compartments have 6" screw in type access ports). By that controversial Florida fellow: http://www.yachtsurvey.com/sinking.htm Eisboch It's for sure this part is kind of scary: "Open Transoms or boats with no transoms have been appearing on the market with more frequency lately, and many of these are just accidents waiting to happen. A boat without a transom cannot reasonably be called seaworthy unless the internal compartments of the hull are made absolutely watertight. This is almost never the case because the builders never put absolutely watertight hatches in the decks. They make a mistake by ignoring the probability that at some point in time the vessel will encounter circumstances where waves are crashing over the nonexistent transom, flooding the deck, and thereby endangering the vessel and its passengers. Builders of such boats don't have the foresight (which they should have) to consider what would happen if such a boat lost power while navigating a dangerous inlet, or breaks down while at sea. Under these circumstances, the lack of a transom becomes very dangerous. Even large sport fishermen with large, open cockpit scuppers or non-sealing transom doors have gotten into trouble under such conditions. If you are the owner of such a boat, you had better think carefully how you use it." Well, I mean, it's scary if that's what you've got! Many modern sailboats have an open transom. It's quite safe. In fact, in some regards, it's considerably safer. Heck, my antique wooden Flying Dutchman didn't have a closed transom. Herring knows less about boats than I do about shortwave radio, and I know absolutely nothing about shortwave radio. He's apparently never been on or even seen a transomless racing sail boat. That's probably because there are cobwebs under the boat trailer in his driveway, and he's never out on the water. You still have the FD? My memory of the class boat was that it had a closed transom, with big flaps that opened to let the water out. Or maybe they were just big square holes in the transom. Been a long time. OK, open transom or large scuppers? Which should it be? I wonder how many "offshore boats" really are self righting? The available info on keeping the sea out vs getting green water out seems contradictory so much that it seems that "offshore" means what ever the manufacturer says it means. Kevin Beddoe has a place ont he FishyFish site where he discusses taking a boat "Madelisa", almost identical to mine 85 miles off Cabo in Baja. Are conditions off Cabo better or worse than early summer in S. FL? From the pics, "Madelisa" has a deck but no scuppers at all. He then describes his deck as not even being sealed. Oi! Oi! Oi! Here's a suggestion. Tow that boat over to the Atlantic side for a few days, and run it in the water. You could launch from Haulover Inlet, and run a nice choppy but not too bad inlet and be right out in the ocean. Head offshore a few miles on a near flat calm day and head out of the inlet on a really choppy snotty day. See how your boat performs. There's nothing you can read here or anywhere else that is going to give you the knowledge base you need to head offshore. Honest Indian. Just remember the Boy Scout motto. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cockpit drainage, lets try again | General | |||
Cockpit drainage, lets try again | General | |||
Cockpit drainage, lets try again | General | |||
Cockpit drainage, lets try again | General | |||
Cockpit drainage, lets try again | General |