On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:45:04 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .


That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic

Hey, I never said it worked.

Eisboch (in his best Harry impersonation)

~~ snerk ~~

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:07:31 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .


That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic


I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater" has
never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Actually predates Ben.
This is dense, but readable, and has good historical reference,
http://www.lightningsafety.com/nlsi_lhm/Uman_Rakov.pdf

--Vic

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...


That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic


I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater"
has never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Eisboch

The University of Florida is recognized as leading, if not the leading,
institution for the study of lightning. The following link may be of
interest to you guys here if you haven't come across it before.

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/co...03electronics/

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Aug 21, 7:45 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message

...



That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic

Hey, I never said it worked.

Eisboch (in his best Harry impersonation)

Every effin day in summer we have lightning shutting stuff down here.
I come in after lunch and power surges have shut down both electron
microscopes. At home during a storm I was sitting 4' from my computer
and a huge spark jumped from the cable modem to the power outlet, the
computer survived. Last week it was my well getting fried by
lightning. I use cordless phones cuz I am terrified of a strike to
the phone lines (another neighbor had that happen to him).


Lightning storms scare the bananas out of me.

Eisboch


Buddy worked in a small low power radio station while in college. A rip and
read news report place. TTY in a closet and 5 minutes before the news, go
rip the page off the TTY and read it. Said they had a lightening strike and
the transmitter reset automatically and when they went to rip, opened the
closed door to a melted TTY. Did not plow the 110V fuse and the resistors
on the telephone pad were still intact. Nothing else harmed.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Aug 21, 7:45 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Vic Smith" wrote in message

...



That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic

Hey, I never said it worked.

Eisboch (in his best Harry impersonation)

Every effin day in summer we have lightning shutting stuff down here.
I come in after lunch and power surges have shut down both electron
microscopes. At home during a storm I was sitting 4' from my computer
and a huge spark jumped from the cable modem to the power outlet, the
computer survived. Last week it was my well getting fried by
lightning. I use cordless phones cuz I am terrified of a strike to
the phone lines (another neighbor had that happen to him).


Lightning storms scare the bananas out of me.

Eisboch

Sorry. Can't help you right now. Got pineapples though.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...


That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic


I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater"
has never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Eisboch

The University of Florida is recognized as leading, if not the leading,
institution for the study of lightning. The following link may be of
interest to you guys here if you haven't come across it before.

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/co...03electronics/

D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...

That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic

I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater"
has never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Eisboch

The University of Florida is recognized as leading, if not the leading,
institution for the study of lightning. The following link may be of
interest to you guys here if you haven't come across it before.

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/co...03electronics/


Florida is the lighting capital of the US. It would make sense the U of
Fl would study it.

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...


That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic


I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater"
has never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Eisboch

The University of Florida is recognized as leading, if not the leading,
institution for the study of lightning. The following link may be of
interest to you guys here if you haven't come across it before.

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/co...03electronics/


Yup, more acknowledgement that we really don't 100% understand lightning.

BTW, I am curious. Did you just resend this post? It arrived on my
computer marked 8/22/2008 at 8:30 am or 15 min ago.
Yet, I seem to recall read the same post yesterday.

With all the goofy stuff going on lately with the servers, I was just
wondering.

Eisboch

"Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote in message
. ..
D.Duck wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...

That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic

I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater"
has never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Eisboch

The University of Florida is recognized as leading, if not the leading,
institution for the study of lightning. The following link may be of
interest to you guys here if you haven't come across it before.

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/co...03electronics/
Florida is the lighting capital of the US. It would make sense the U of
Fl would study it.

Roger that. I live 50 miles from the UF and have seen some of their open
field test setups where they catch lightning in a bottle.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...


That isn't a school of thought in the scientific community.
It's been pretty well debunked, but will live on, like Bigfoot.
We could argue about it, but I have the feeling it would be endless no
matter how many cites I come up with.
Of course I'm not a scientist, but can google like crazy.
If you have NFPA approved lightning protection the addition
of devices of "the other school" will do no harm.
But IMO the "other school" alone is Voodoo - and dangerous.
The danger part is why I feel compelled to answer your post.

--Vic


I am not a scientist either, but have an interest in this kind of stuff.
From what I can tell, the operational theory of a "Lightning Dissipater"
has never been scientifically proved .... or disproved.
So, the controversy continues.

However, those that believe it works are in good company.
Nicola Tesla patented it in 1918. He is rumored to know a thing or two
about electricity.
Ol' Ben Franklin even muttered about it.

Eisboch

The University of Florida is recognized as leading, if not the leading,
institution for the study of lightning. The following link may be of
interest to you guys here if you haven't come across it before.

http://www.powerandmotoryacht.com/co...03electronics/


Yup, more acknowledgement that we really don't 100% understand lightning.

BTW, I am curious. Did you just resend this post? It arrived on my
computer marked 8/22/2008 at 8:30 am or 15 min ago.
Yet, I seem to recall read the same post yesterday.

With all the goofy stuff going on lately with the servers, I was just
wondering.

Eisboch

Yes, the double post was a glitch on my part. I saw the message still in my
Outbox this morning and when trying to clear it, it was sent a second time.