On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:13:03 -0400, hk wrote:

BAR wrote:
hk wrote:
...do you own?

3?
4?
5?
6?
7?


John McCain, who said some months ago he didn't know much about the
economy, yesterday said he didn't know how many houses he owned, and
how many houses his wife owned.

(The answer for McCain and spouse is at least seven houses.)

I'm sure the millions of Americans who recently lost their houses, or
are about to, or are hoping they won't in the future, can identify
with the ultra-rich McCains and McCain's possible running mate, the
ultra-rich Mitt Romney.

John McCain, the man for the middle class. snerk

As it turns out John McCain doesn't own any houses and has built a wall
between his and his wife's finances. So, not knowing how many houses his
wife has is a good ethically speaking. But, you wouldn't understand that.

snerk

Just another example of how little McCain really knows about the world
around him.

Well, have fun the rest of the election cycle Harry.

Clearly you are out of your ****ing mind.

Talk to you after November 2nd.

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:45:00 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 21, 9:32 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:07 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Neither do I.

That makes two of us.

I had a radish, cucumber and three cheese brocolli spread sandwich on
hard rye today at the local lunch emporium - $4.95 with half sour
pickle spear and homemade kettle fried potato chips.

Complimentary sweet tea.

Can't beat it.

Get it - eggs - beat it- good sandwich?

Ok, sorry - that was obtuse.

By the reasoning of HK (we gotta give him some slack, you know how
hard it is for those out of practice), Obama has no relevant
qualifications for pres.

I'm out of the political discussions other than to say this.

I'm voting for McCain.

And that's saying something becuase after all, McCain

WAS A FREAKIN' SQUID!!!

I can't believe I'm voting for a squid. :)

~~ mutter - navy ~~

On Aug 21, 8:50*pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:45:00 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





On Aug 21, 9:32 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:07 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Neither do I.

That makes two of us.

I had a radish, cucumber and three cheese brocolli spread sandwich on
hard rye today at the local lunch emporium - $4.95 with half sour
pickle spear and homemade kettle fried potato chips.

Complimentary sweet tea.

Can't beat it.

Get it - eggs - beat it- good sandwich?

Ok, sorry - that was obtuse.

By the reasoning of HK (we gotta give him some slack, you know how
hard it is for those out of practice), Obama has no relevant
qualifications for pres.

I'm out of the political discussions other than to say this.

I'm voting for McCain.

And that's saying something becuase after all, McCain

WAS A FREAKIN' SQUID!!!

I can't believe I'm voting for a squid. *:)

~~ mutter - navy ~~- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

When you were in, you were under the dept of the Navy.

so you're a dry land squid? Frog? Duck? Coot?

(I'll quit while I'm thinking I'm ahead now)

I'm voting for McCain.

So am I! Mainly because if Harry is supporting someone, he's GOTTA be the
wrong choice. He's a friggin' loony.

--Mike


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:45:00 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Aug 21, 9:32 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:07 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Neither do I.

That makes two of us.

I had a radish, cucumber and three cheese brocolli spread sandwich on
hard rye today at the local lunch emporium - $4.95 with half sour
pickle spear and homemade kettle fried potato chips.

Complimentary sweet tea.

Can't beat it.

Get it - eggs - beat it- good sandwich?

Ok, sorry - that was obtuse.

By the reasoning of HK (we gotta give him some slack, you know how
hard it is for those out of practice), Obama has no relevant
qualifications for pres.

I'm out of the political discussions other than to say this.

I'm voting for McCain.

And that's saying something becuase after all, McCain

WAS A FREAKIN' SQUID!!!

I can't believe I'm voting for a squid. :)

~~ mutter - navy ~~

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:49:24 -0700, "Mike" wrote:

So am I! Mainly because if Harry is supporting someone, he's GOTTA be the
wrong choice. He's a friggin' loony.

Harry who ?

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:07 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Neither do I.

That makes two of us.

I had a radish, cucumber and three cheese brocolli spread sandwich on
hard rye today at the local lunch emporium - $4.95 with half sour
pickle spear and homemade kettle fried potato chips.

Complimentary sweet tea.

Can't beat it.

Get it - eggs - beat it- good sandwich?

Ok, sorry - that was obtuse.

I had a #1 combo at Wendy's today. 1/4# burger and choice of side, and
drink. $4.88 including tax. Choice of salad, fries, baked potato, mandarin
oranges, or chili. Bought yogurt for the wife who had a tooth pull
yesterday. Yogurt at Safeway, their brand, 10 for $5. Looking for a new
backup solenoid for the trailer. West Marine had an Atwood for $55 and the
Boat and Motor Mart in Oakland had the same one for $76. Neither met the
cut as I have a Tie-down coupler and the solenoid fits inside the housing.
Though I had air in the brakes, much as HK has in his head, and the real
problem was the blocking solenoid was blocking and so no brakes. Obama is
looking worse and worse as a man of the people. 1/2 brother that lives on
$12 a year while Obama buys $1.3million houses at a discount. While only
making maybe $150K as a Senator. A Senator who is never there.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:12:21 -0400, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:38:39 -0400, hk wrote:

I don't think one day of McCain's military experience is relevant to
the job he is seeking.
You sure as hell did when Kerry was running.
Only in comparison to Bush's dangerous service with the Texas Air
National Guard, and Cheney and Rumsfeld's war mongering in the face of
non-service.

By itself, it has no relevance. What's relevant is having the smarts
to avoid wars or to find a way to extricate a country from an ongoing
war.
So let me see if I understand you.

1 - By comparison, Kerry's military combat record was relevant becasue
Bush never saw combat and thus was the superior candidate.

2 - Kerry had military combat experience and the VP and SecDef at that
time didn't thus making him the superior candidate.

3 - Based on one and two, Kerry was the superior candidate because he
had more military experience than the Administration had.

4 - It was relevant then, but not relevant now.

I understand completely.

I know some farmers who would love to hire you to fertilize their
fields because their entire herd of cows aren't as full of what makes
the grass grow green as you are.
Both Kerry and Bush used their military records in their campaigns.
Compared to Bush's holiday with the TANG, Kerry's "military" record was
real. Bush's was b.s. In choosing a POTUS, though, I don't think
either's military record was relevant. Cheney and Rumsfeld were simply
war mongerers, and compared to their non-experience, Kerry's service was
relevant.

The point is, you really don't understand. Too abstract, I suppose.

There's abstract and then there abstractly obtuse.

You clearly specialize in the obtusely abstract.


I also specialize in moderating a section of a discussion board that has
thousands of daily contributors. You?

Let's see. Thousands of messages, that's at least 2000. Assume it takes an
average of 15 seconds to "moderate" each message.

15 seconds X 2000 msgs = 30K seconds.
30K sec / 60 = 500 minutes
500 min / 60 = 8.3 hours

How do you find time to fish?

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:07 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

Neither do I.

That makes two of us.

I had a radish, cucumber and three cheese brocolli spread sandwich on
hard rye today at the local lunch emporium - $4.95 with half sour
pickle spear and homemade kettle fried potato chips.

Complimentary sweet tea.

Can't beat it.

Get it - eggs - beat it- good sandwich?

Ok, sorry - that was obtuse.

You eat like that and no wonder you get your shorts in a bunch sometimes.
8)

"Tim" wrote in message
...
On Aug 21, 8:50 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:45:00 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:





On Aug 21, 9:32 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:07 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:02 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Neither do I.

That makes two of us.

I had a radish, cucumber and three cheese brocolli spread sandwich on
hard rye today at the local lunch emporium - $4.95 with half sour
pickle spear and homemade kettle fried potato chips.

Complimentary sweet tea.

Can't beat it.

Get it - eggs - beat it- good sandwich?

Ok, sorry - that was obtuse.

By the reasoning of HK (we gotta give him some slack, you know how
hard it is for those out of practice), Obama has no relevant
qualifications for pres.

I'm out of the political discussions other than to say this.

I'm voting for McCain.

And that's saying something becuase after all, McCain

WAS A FREAKIN' SQUID!!!

I can't believe I'm voting for a squid. :)

~~ mutter - navy ~~- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

When you were in, you were under the dept of the Navy.

so you're a dry land squid? Frog? Duck? Coot?

(I'll quit while I'm thinking I'm ahead now)
=============================

Duck, NO!. 8)

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:20:10 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:12:21 -0400, hk wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:38:39 -0400, hk wrote:

I don't think one day of McCain's military experience is relevant to
the job he is seeking.
You sure as hell did when Kerry was running.
Only in comparison to Bush's dangerous service with the Texas Air
National Guard, and Cheney and Rumsfeld's war mongering in the face of
non-service.

By itself, it has no relevance. What's relevant is having the smarts
to avoid wars or to find a way to extricate a country from an ongoing
war.
So let me see if I understand you.

1 - By comparison, Kerry's military combat record was relevant becasue
Bush never saw combat and thus was the superior candidate.

2 - Kerry had military combat experience and the VP and SecDef at that
time didn't thus making him the superior candidate.

3 - Based on one and two, Kerry was the superior candidate because he
had more military experience than the Administration had.

4 - It was relevant then, but not relevant now.

I understand completely.

I know some farmers who would love to hire you to fertilize their
fields because their entire herd of cows aren't as full of what makes
the grass grow green as you are.
Both Kerry and Bush used their military records in their campaigns.
Compared to Bush's holiday with the TANG, Kerry's "military" record was
real. Bush's was b.s. In choosing a POTUS, though, I don't think
either's military record was relevant. Cheney and Rumsfeld were simply
war mongerers, and compared to their non-experience, Kerry's service was
relevant.

The point is, you really don't understand. Too abstract, I suppose.

There's abstract and then there abstractly obtuse.

You clearly specialize in the obtusely abstract.

I also specialize in moderating a section of a discussion board that has
thousands of daily contributors. You?

Let's see. Thousands of messages, that's at least 2000. Assume it takes an
average of 15 seconds to "moderate" each message.

15 seconds X 2000 msgs = 30K seconds.
30K sec / 60 = 500 minutes
500 min / 60 = 8.3 hours

How do you find time to fish?

Harry doesn't moderte anything.

Anywhere.