Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote:
So, what is your guess on the GOP veep? Jeb Bush ;-) |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 8:41*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: hk wrote: Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message m... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:dtmdnW4FMIWtDivVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d@comcast. com... Hillary was absolutely masterful, Bill was damned good, Biden was good and will get much better as he adapts to his new speechwriters.. I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch Why? It's traditional and appropriate at that moment- the end of the speech at a convention - for the candidate's family to appear on stage. Besides, Biden, especially, has a compelling family story, as I am sure you know. So...you're a Republican...what's your guess on the veep nom? Wrong, ballot-breath. * *I am a registered nothing, *consider myself an Independent, although certainly admit to right leaning tendencies on most issues. *In some areas though, I am probably as liberal as you. *gasp I have a bit of a hang-up about the concept of being a "registered" member of any political party. *Doing so tends to make one accept and, by default, support platform issues that one otherwise may not be in agreement with. Lemmings. * We saw that during the Dem's convention. * Compromises of principles by all for the "common good" of the party. * Past differences forgotten. * *Nope, not for me. I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document. I think you completely missed the point that Eisboch was making.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Really, I am registered repub, but have voted for more Democrats for pres, than repubs.. First off, I am an American... |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:50:39 -0400, hk wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:38:42 -0400, hk wrote: So, what is your guess on the GOP veep? Jeb Bush ;-) In this household, we never could figure why the Bush family passed over the smart son and pushed the stupid one into the White House. That would be funny, though...McCain and Bush, all over again. Seriously, if it weren't for his name, Jeb might not be a bad pick. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. In the past, I've voted both. I voted for Carter once and I voted for Clinton once. Does that surprise you? So, I don't consider myself a Republican or a Democrat. I simply vote for one or the other, depending on my modest judgement of who will best serve the national interests of the USA. One of the attractive qualities of Obama .... in fact maybe the *only* attractive quality .... is that a President Obama would probably be better equipped to salvage and repair our image abroad at the moment. Not to be pandering to forgein opinion, but in this day and age respect of the USA by others is important to our national interests, economy and security. I realize that and it's an important issue. Bush's policies, right or wrong, have pretty much demolished any international respect. On the other hand, Russia is flexing it's muscles again, taking full advantage of our current weaknesses and lack of international support. That also has me a bit concerned. I don't think academic diplomacy alone will nip it. The office of POTUS is more about leadership in a global environment than it is about detailed social policies at home, IMO. There are other bodies of elected representatives (Congress) that should be doing their job. As for McCain's VP pick? I really don't know. A couple of weeks ago I was thinking it would be Romney for sure, but I have a hunch that we may be in for a surprise. Eisboch |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 9:06*am, "Eisboch" wrote:
hk wrote: I am a registered Democrat. I haven't read through a Democratic party platform document in decades, probably not since 1970. I have no idea what is in this year's "platform," and I couldn't care less. My father in law is a lifelong registered Republican. I haven't asked him, but I suspect he has never ever read a GOP party platform document. Question then: When you enter your voting booth, do you vote a straight Democratic ticket? Or, do you pick and choose, voting for a Republican here and there if you think the person running is better qualified. Honest answer only, please. Eisboch The words honest and Harry don't go hand in hand!!!! |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:47:19 -0400, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 28, 8:32 am, hk wrote: wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:11:21 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch snerk kids are tools to guys like that.. Biden may have some warts, but his parenting skills are not in question. One of Biden's sons was elected and serves as attorney general of Delaware, and the other is a lawyer and member of the board of directors of Amtrak. I don't know what Ashley Biden, the daughter of Joe's second marriage does, but I am pretty sure she doesn't make obscene gestures into the camera when it is pointed at her. I wonder what Justwait's kids will do when they are older? Follow their father's example? I dunno, one of my kids is an accountant, the other works for a non- profit which tends to the poor, mostly folks from other countries and American Indians.. Oh, and travels the world, oh, and just finished her Masters.... Yup, as a stay home dad, I am pretty proud of my kids... even if they have fun here and there. They trust and love their parents.. So who were their parents? How *anyone* here can have any respect for you is totally beyond me. |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 28, 10:05*am, John H wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:47:19 -0400, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 28, 8:32 am, hk wrote: wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:11:21 -0700, justwaitafrekinminute wrote: I am surprised you are not upset about Biden showing off his grandchildren. Eisboch snerk kids are tools to guys like that.. Biden may have some warts, but his parenting skills are not in question. * One of Biden's sons was elected and serves as attorney general of Delaware, and the other is a lawyer and member of the board of directors of Amtrak. I don't know what Ashley Biden, the daughter of Joe's second marriage does, but I am pretty sure she doesn't make obscene gestures into the camera when it is pointed at her. I wonder what Justwait's kids will do when they are older? Follow their father's example? I dunno, one of my kids is an accountant, the other works for a non- profit which tends to the poor, mostly folks from other countries and American Indians.. Oh, and travels the world, oh, and just finished her Masters.... *Yup, as a stay home dad, I am pretty proud of my kids... even if they have fun here and there. They trust and love their parents.. So who were their parents? How *anyone* here can have any respect for you is totally beyond me.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree. There is no one as low of a scumbag as he is, and his lover/ clone JimH is trying VERY hard! |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: I vote for the person who I think will best serve the best interests of the USA in national and international issues, not for the one who will best forward a political party's agenda, developed through political compromise and back room deals. Eisboch You don't have to be "registered" to be a Republican or a Democrat. If you vote mostly Republican, you are a Republican. You vote mostly Republican, I am sure, especially for President. In the past, I've voted both. I voted for Carter once and I voted for Clinton once. Does that surprise you? So, I don't consider myself a Republican or a Democrat. I simply vote for one or the other, depending on my modest judgement of who will best serve the national interests of the USA. One of the attractive qualities of Obama .... in fact maybe the *only* attractive quality .... is that a President Obama would probably be better equipped to salvage and repair our image abroad at the moment. Not to be pandering to forgein opinion, but in this day and age respect of the USA by others is important to our national interests, economy and security. I realize that and it's an important issue. Bush's policies, right or wrong, have pretty much demolished any international respect. On the other hand, Russia is flexing it's muscles again, taking full advantage of our current weaknesses and lack of international support. That also has me a bit concerned. I don't think academic diplomacy alone will nip it. The office of POTUS is more about leadership in a global environment than it is about detailed social policies at home, IMO. There are other bodies of elected representatives (Congress) that should be doing their job. As for McCain's VP pick? I really don't know. A couple of weeks ago I was thinking it would be Romney for sure, but I have a hunch that we may be in for a surprise. Eisboch Whatever Russia does, there's nothing in McCain's resume that indicate he will be equipped to deal with it. -- No way, no how, no McCain! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone hear McCain... | General | |||
McCain | General | |||
How About Some McCain Waffles for Breakfast? | General | |||
The Real McCain - 2 | General | |||
Tom's Boy McCain...Nothing but B.S. | General |