On Sep 3, 1:55*pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. *I rarely reply. *However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All". *He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. *The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. *He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. *However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? *I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. *He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. *I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. *I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. *Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. *Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. *I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just ignore the e mails.

I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.

Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:55*pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. *I rarely reply. *However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All". *He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. *The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. *He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. *However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? *I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. *He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. *I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. *I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. *Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. *Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. *I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Just ignore the e mails.

I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.

Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.

JimH wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:55 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. I rarely reply. However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All". He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just ignore the e mails.
I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.
Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.



That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's place.

Herring is foul turd.

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:46:06 -0400, JimH wrote:


I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.

Well post 'em, you little liar.

In the meantime: http://tinyurl.com/o42at

On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:51:30 -0400, hk wrote:

JimH wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:55 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. I rarely reply. However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All". He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just ignore the e mails.
I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.
Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.



That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's place.

Herring is foul turd.

Post 'em, you little liar!

In the meantime: http://tinyurl.com/o42at

On Sep 3, 8:02 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:51:30 -0400, hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:55 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. I rarely reply. However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All". He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just ignore the e mails.
I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.
Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.

That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's place.

Herring is foul turd.

Post 'em, you little liar!

In the meantime:http://tinyurl.com/o42at

Hey, STOP. I am actually asking for advice because I am about to lose
a good friend over this. In his most recent e-mail, he called me a
racist (actually implied it) with no basis so it is gettign worse. I
even ask for advice from HK cuz he knows I listen to him even though I
done agree with him.

On Sep 3, 11:29*pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 8:02 pm, John H wrote:





On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:51:30 -0400, hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:55 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. *I rarely reply. *However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All".. *He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. *The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. *He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. *However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? *I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. *He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. *I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. *I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. *Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. *Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. *I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just ignore the e mails.
I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.
Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.

That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's place.

Herring is foul turd.

Post 'em, you little liar!

In the meantime:http://tinyurl.com/o42at

Hey, STOP. *I am actually asking for advice because I am about to lose
a good friend over this. *In his most recent e-mail, he called me a
racist (actually implied it) with no basis so it is gettign worse. *I
even ask for advice from HK cuz he knows I listen to him even though I
done agree with him.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If he is namecalling, he is insecure about his writing, that is the
way the far left handles opposing viewpoints. They really can't handle
honest debate, as their ideology is not based on logic, but emotion
and insecurity. I would post his writing to the local paper, see how
strongly he really feels about his ideas...

On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:29:05 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 8:02 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:51:30 -0400, hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 3, 1:55 pm, hk wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Sep 3, 12:40 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, wrote:
On Sep 3, 1:33 pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
This issue has arisen before but I dropped it.
A friend of mine sends political e-mails to a list of about 30
people. I rarely reply. However, lately some of them have been very
sleazy to my way of thinking so I have decided to "Reply All". He
does not want me to "reply all" but to just send replies to him. The
sleaziness of the latest e-mails has made me decide that "reply All"
is appropriate. He has decided to take me off the list which I think
is his right. However, he has the right but what would you think of
this person? I believe he is not taking responsibility for what he
says and I think he is behaving in a cowardly manner although I have
not said so.
To my way of thinking, his political posts which are kinda leftish are
similar to the person who privately to his friends uses the N word and
acts racist but acts politically correct in public. He is a local
attorney and official in the local Dem party as are some people on his
e-mail list. I believe he is afraid that my replies may cause
political problems for him. I hate to lose a friend over politics
but ..........
What do you think?
Screw him. If he can't let a reply be seen by all, then he shouldn't be
sending the emails to all.
Give him Harry's address ). That'll add some
back-patting to his leftist crap.
I really do not want to be taken off his list because much of what he
sends is humorous and even most political stuff is ok even though I
disagree. Quite frankly I simply do not understand his attitude in
not wanting any response unless he is afraid of the consequences of my
responses.
The last time him and I discussed this he said that what he send is
"Just stuff people send him that he thinks will be of interest".
Often this is true but much of the political stuff is not like that,
it is clearly slanted toward a specific party. Even that is ok but
sleaze for political purposes is problematic for me. I let it go last
time because I did not want to cause a rift among a circle of friends.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Just ignore the e mails.
I delete about 30 a day because a couple friends of mine like to send
"little cutsie" stuff. to the point I just knock the emails out.
Herring used to send me his bull**** by email and "PM."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Harrytales, you are full of ****, of course...

I believe Harry as I also received a good number of emails and PM's
from John, all of which were personal insults to me and most of which
contained fould and obscene landguage.

That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's place.

Herring is foul turd.

Post 'em, you little liar!

In the meantime:http://tinyurl.com/o42at

Hey, STOP. I am actually asking for advice because I am about to lose
a good friend over this. In his most recent e-mail, he called me a
racist (actually implied it) with no basis so it is gettign worse. I
even ask for advice from HK cuz he knows I listen to him even though I
done agree with him.

Sounds like you aready lost your "good friend". If he's emailed a
group impling you are a racist and then asking you to respond only to
him, then I'd say forget him and move on. He's not even remotely your
friend, let alone a good friend.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:




That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's
place.

Herring is foul turd.

I receive so many foul mouth obsence messages from JimH and Harry that I too
had to block both of them.

"John H" wrote in message
...


That's correct. It got so bad I had to "block sender" him at Chuck's
place.

Herring is foul turd.

Post 'em, you little liar!

I think they must be thinking about all the foul mouth obsence messages they
sent to me. Of course I just ignored them until I blocked them.