Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 10:36*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Sep 7, 10:06 am, RPSIII wrote: hk wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: these folks to talk to Harry about Stumpy... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roFB7bGCAgc Sorry, Brownie...Stumpy is no more. How's that 20" transom on your Ranger in a following sea...I'll bet it is a real shorts stainer, eh? Does SWS have a big hole in his transom? *If so he really should keep that boat in lakes and only use it on calm days, the same as you do. Now if he has a boat with a "real" 20" transom it will keep out waves, wakes and a following sea, substantially better than your Baby Parker.. I really have enjoyed all of your photos of your Baby Parker parked on it's trailer, but the only time you posted a photo of it actually in the water was last year, when you took a photo of it's hour meter. Isn't it time to post an update of your hour meter? Shortpants Ranger is a nice smooth "Bay Boat", that will handle almost anything you throw at it. I have been on the thing skimming over the waves, airborne, it flies nice. The problem with the parker is, it has not kept up with the times. It's plain Jane, and has all of the appeal of a Payson Brick..Those geezers there don't understand that with new technology, a boat can be functional AND look like the lines were drawn this century by someone with other than a t-square.. Not to mention, that huge hole in the ass end.. Guess they couldn't take the time to put the hull on a board and incorporate a body style that suits it's 20 inch transom.. Instead they put high sides around the 20" transom, square and ugly of course, to meet the sides.. Like sticking two different boats together with kindergarten paste... It's a 25" transom at the notch, **** for brains. Just, Damn, I had no idea SWS boat was so unsafe. *You are lucky you escaped alive. *Since SWS actually uses his boat, his time has come, he is a goner, that boat will get flooded, his ETEC will failed, and he will be shark bait before you know it. *Whatever you do, don't go out on that boat again. Let me tell you something.. Shortpants will get you home, I have no doubt. One day we were heading out toward the race and he asked if I wanted to take the trip through the notch. He said it would get pretty hairy, but we could do it. I told him he was he Captain, I am just along for the ride ![]() get on the boat in the first place. The boat was awesome, big air, flies straight, lands soft. Tom sees water, conditions, weather, long before it is a part of the equation. *From what I can tell, Harry's boat has never come close to sinking on the trailer, the only problem is that it does have a tendency to collect some leaves on the cover from lack of use. See, it's like Payson/Bolger's old boat "cartopper" [http:// smallboats.com/boats_cartopper.htm]. It's made to row, sail, and motor.. Problem is, it like any other tradeoff boat, does none of them very well. Looking at Hawwys Pawkah, it seems a lazy design. They took a flat old bay boat, added high sides (with no appeal) a deep vee, and a huge honkin' hole in the transom instead of thinking things out and re-tooling for modern advances, and said to the truly stupid, here is an ocean goer, capable even Hawways grandest adventures. Who can forget sailing single handed from Catalina Island, rounding the horn, and the other great deeds our dear wafa has claimed.. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 10:48*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Sep 7, 10:36 am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. " wrote: HK wrote: wrote: On Sep 7, 10:06 am, RPSIII wrote: hk wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: these folks to talk to Harry about Stumpy... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roFB7bGCAgc Sorry, Brownie...Stumpy is no more. How's that 20" transom on your Ranger in a following sea...I'll bet it is a real shorts stainer, eh? Does SWS have a big hole in his transom? *If so he really should keep that boat in lakes and only use it on calm days, the same as you do.. Now if he has a boat with a "real" 20" transom it will keep out waves, wakes and a following sea, substantially better than your Baby Parker. I really have enjoyed all of your photos of your Baby Parker parked on it's trailer, but the only time you posted a photo of it actually in the water was last year, when you took a photo of it's hour meter. Isn't it time to post an update of your hour meter? Shortpants Ranger is a nice smooth "Bay Boat", that will handle almost anything you throw at it. I have been on the thing skimming over the waves, airborne, it flies nice. The problem with the parker is, it has not kept up with the times. It's plain Jane, and has all of the appeal of a Payson Brick..Those geezers there don't understand that with new technology, a boat can be functional AND look like the lines were drawn this century by someone with other than a t-square.. Not to mention, that huge hole in the ass end.. Guess they couldn't take the time to put the hull on a board and incorporate a body style that suits it's 20 inch transom.. Instead they put high sides around the 20" transom, square and ugly of course, to meet the sides.. Like sticking two different boats together with kindergarten paste... It's a 25" transom at the notch, **** for brains. Just, Damn, I had no idea SWS boat was so unsafe. *You are lucky you escaped alive. *Since SWS actually uses his boat, his time has come, he is a goner, that boat will get flooded, his ETEC will failed, and he will be shark bait before you know it. *Whatever you do, don't go out on that boat again. Let me tell you something.. Shortpants will get you home, I have no doubt. One day we were heading out toward the race and he asked if I wanted to take the trip through the notch. He said it would get pretty hairy, but we could do it. I told him he was he Captain, I am just along for the ride ![]() get on the boat in the first place. The boat was awesome, big air, flies straight, lands soft. Tom sees water, conditions, weather, long before it is a part of the equation. *From what I can tell, Harry's boat has never come close to sinking on the trailer, the only problem is that it does have a tendency to collect some leaves on the cover from lack of use. See, it's like Payson/Bolger's old boat "cartopper" [http:// smallboats.com/boats_cartopper.htm]. It's made to row, sail, and motor.. Problem is, it like any other tradeoff boat, does none of them very well. Looking at Hawwys Pawkah, it seems a lazy design. They took a flat old bay boat, added high sides (with no appeal) a deep vee, and a huge honkin' hole in the transom instead of thinking things out and re-tooling for modern advances, and said to the truly stupid, here is an ocean goer, capable even Hawways grandest adventures. Who can forget sailing single handed from Catalina Island, rounding the horn, and the other great deeds our dear wafa has claimed.. This from a guy who can't even paint a wood boat in workmanlike fashion?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You are the only one who says that, even if you do say it with a couple of sockpuppets. I use different techniques, depending on the boat, and it's intended use.. And every last one of my boats has more character than your "Mr. Potato Head" boat... Check the cartopper link above, I used Poly based Petit, with a roll and tip, nice paint job... |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch I posted how transom height on bracketless outboard boats is measured. Ask Tom for that measure you want on his boat...I've not seen a Ranger of his model ever. I think it was only made one year and then dropped. The fact that he had to mount a bracket and then get a longer shaft engine tells me the design was flawed. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch I posted how transom height on bracketless outboard boats is measured. I understand. My question was what is the distance between the top of the notch and the waterline? Eisboch |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch I posted how transom height on bracketless outboard boats is measured. I understand. My question was what is the distance between the top of the notch and the waterline? Eisboch I saw some photos that Parker published in their brochure, and there was about 3" between the top of the notch and the waterline. There were links posted in rec.boats so I am sure they can be seen via Google. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch I posted how transom height on bracketless outboard boats is measured. I understand. My question was what is the distance between the top of the notch and the waterline? Eisboch .0 Dunno...never measured that. More than the distance between the notch on Tom's boat and the waterline. More important for salt water use is the height above the waterline at the bow and along the hullsides. Some time ago, I mentioned that Tom's boat would fit inside mine and disappear, except for the top of his console. Now that I know that Ranger has a 20" transom, I am even more sure of it. Even my old SeaPros had 25" transoms. No wonder Tom made such an issue over a low transom. :) |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch I posted how transom height on bracketless outboard boats is measured. I understand. My question was what is the distance between the top of the notch and the waterline? Eisboch This might help: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...s/propwrap.jpg At rest, the round stainless drain below the scuppers on the port side is above the waterline, and in fact, if you stretched a line across the transom from one chine to the other, it would mark the waterline, because the outside edge of the trim tabs are also visible. I'm guessing what is out of the water is about half the height of the transom, or around 12.5 inches at rest. Just a guess. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: That's right...it's 25" from the top of the transom notch to the bottom of the boat at the transom. How the hell do you think transom height is measured? What's the distance between the top of the transom notch and the waterline? Eisboch I posted how transom height on bracketless outboard boats is measured. I understand. My question was what is the distance between the top of the notch and the waterline? Eisboch This might help: http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...s/propwrap.jpg At rest, the round stainless drain below the scuppers on the port side is above the waterline, and in fact, if you stretched a line across the transom from one chine to the other, it would mark the waterline, because the outside edge of the trim tabs are also visible. I'm guessing what is out of the water is about half the height of the transom, or around 12.5 inches at rest. Just a guess. Here you can see the boat floating on its lines: http://www.parkerboats.net/pages/boa...l.jsp?boatid=7 Note that the boat is on its chine at the stern. Also notice how high the bow and sides are... Note that the Bay model of the 21 footer is much lower in the water...it is built on an entirely different hull. http://www.parkerboats.net/pages/boa...l.jsp?boatid=5 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|