Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 10:22 pm, hk wrote:
wrote: Assume the following situation: McCain wins the electoral votes but Obama wins the popular vote. Late in December, Say Dec. 28, something happens to McCain so he is not able to take office. Who would become president? The constitution is not clear on this, would it be Palin? Would the Dems insist on a new election? If the decision went beyond the inaugural date, who would b president in the interim? Would it be House majority leader? Now, I get partisan. Assume Bush says he thinks Palin is the new pres and says he will hand over to her refusing to give Pelosi any way to bcome pres even for a few days. The Dems go crazy. A blue state or two decide they will not recognize Palin as Pres. Republicans in these two blue states are attacked. Palin sends in the Nat Guard..............new American Civil War. Could it really happen this easily? You really need to read the Constitution. Harry, I spend 99.999% of my time reading techie stuff and have not read the Constitution since i was 25 yrs old. |
#3
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 10:42 pm, wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:22 pm, hk wrote: wrote: Assume the following situation: McCain wins the electoral votes but Obama wins the popular vote. Late in December, Say Dec. 28, something happens to McCain so he is not able to take office. Who would become president? The constitution is not clear on this, would it be Palin? Would the Dems insist on a new election? If the decision went beyond the inaugural date, who would b president in the interim? Would it be House majority leader? Now, I get partisan. Assume Bush says he thinks Palin is the new pres and says he will hand over to her refusing to give Pelosi any way to bcome pres even for a few days. The Dems go crazy. A blue state or two decide they will not recognize Palin as Pres. Republicans in these two blue states are attacked. Palin sends in the Nat Guard..............new American Civil War. Could it really happen this easily? You really need to read the Constitution. Harry, I spend 99.999% of my time reading techie stuff and have not read the Constitution since i was 25 yrs old. Vaughn: The one that happened in the mid 1800s resulted in some naval battles. |
#4
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 12:39 am, wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:42:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sep 7, 10:22 pm, hk wrote: wrote: Assume the following situation: McCain wins the electoral votes but Obama wins the popular vote. Late in December, Say Dec. 28, something happens to McCain so he is not able to take office. Who would become president? The constitution is not clear on this, would it be Palin? Would the Dems insist on a new election? If the decision went beyond the inaugural date, who would b president in the interim? Would it be House majority leader? Now, I get partisan. Assume Bush says he thinks Palin is the new pres and says he will hand over to her refusing to give Pelosi any way to bcome pres even for a few days. The Dems go crazy. A blue state or two decide they will not recognize Palin as Pres. Republicans in these two blue states are attacked. Palin sends in the Nat Guard..............new American Civil War. Could it really happen this easily? You really need to read the Constitution. Harry, I spend 99.999% of my time reading techie stuff and have not read the Constitution since i was 25 yrs old. It's a good question but you picked the wrong date. Make that January 7 and you have an interesting scenario. Jan 6 is when the congress actually decides who the Electoral college voted for. Up until then the election is really still undecided. If the "winner" was dead the congress might not ratify the vote. That is where the constitutional crisis would start. If it was not resolved, on Jan 20 the speaker of the house would be the president. There was that discussion in 2000. Now if the candidate had been declared the winner on Jan 6 and then fails to take office I believe the 25th amendment kicks in and the VP gets inaugurated. If I was retired I'd have all the time I needed to re-read the constitution and everything else I'd like to read. |
#6
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sep 8, 12:39 am, wrote: If I was retired I'd have all the time I needed to re-read the constitution and everything else I'd like to read. its online and takes ten minutes. |
#8
![]()
posted to sci.military.naval,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 10:39*am, "Raymond O'Hara"
wrote: wrote in message ... On Sep 8, 12:39 am, wrote: If I was retired I'd have all the time I needed to re-read the constitution and everything else I'd like to read. *its online and takes ten minutes. Everything he'd like to read is online and only takes ten minutes? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:37:00 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... wrote: On Sep 7, 10:22 pm, hk wrote: wrote: Assume the following situation: McCain wins the electoral votes but Obama wins the popular vote. Late in December, Say Dec. 28, something happens to McCain so he is not able to take office. Who would become president? The constitution is not clear on this, would it be Palin? Would the Dems insist on a new election? If the decision went beyond the inaugural date, who would b president in the interim? Would it be House majority leader? Now, I get partisan. Assume Bush says he thinks Palin is the new pres and says he will hand over to her refusing to give Pelosi any way to bcome pres even for a few days. The Dems go crazy. A blue state or two decide they will not recognize Palin as Pres. Republicans in these two blue states are attacked. Palin sends in the Nat Guard..............new American Civil War. Could it really happen this easily? You really need to read the Constitution. Harry, I spend 99.999% of my time reading techie stuff and have not read the Constitution since i was 25 yrs old. Well, it isn't a lengthy document and most of it is pretty straightforward. Then how come the judges seem to have so many conflicting opinions regarding what the Constitution says? [Note: this reply is not cross posted.] It's like religion. Some folks believe in a strict, word by word interpretation of the bible, some use it as a guide while making their own rules. Conservatives like to stick with what the constitution actually says, liberals like to make their own laws picking and choosing the 'constitutional' words they will use. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Canada's health care crisis | General | |||
Mid life kneeling crisis | General | |||
Canada's Health Care Crisis - update | General | |||
OT--Sleazy politics...Dems caught TRYING TO EXTEND budget crisis | General |