Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This link has the details, but I'll summarize.
For those considering power options for the 400 Super Sport, these are revealing statistics at WOT. 2 x 370-hp Volvo Penta D6 Diesels use 40.6 gph. 2 x 525-hp Mercury Racing EFI Bravo III XR use 85.9 gph. The Bravos are faster, but some might go with the Volvos because of their fuel-sipping quality. 111% fuel savings! That's pretty darn impressive. http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=2929 --Vic |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vic Smith wrote:
This link has the details, but I'll summarize. For those considering power options for the 400 Super Sport, these are revealing statistics at WOT. 2 x 370-hp Volvo Penta D6 Diesels use 40.6 gph. 2 x 525-hp Mercury Racing EFI Bravo III XR use 85.9 gph. The Bravos are faster, but some might go with the Volvos because of their fuel-sipping quality. 111% fuel savings! That's pretty darn impressive. http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=2929 --Vic "111% fuel savings! That's pretty darn impressive." Did SW Tom do the math? I'm only asking because a fuel savings that high would seem to violate the laws of physics. 111% would mean the diesels create fuel. Now a 50% savings...that's impressive. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:05:46 -0400, Boater
wrote: Vic Smith wrote: This link has the details, but I'll summarize. For those considering power options for the 400 Super Sport, these are revealing statistics at WOT. 2 x 370-hp Volvo Penta D6 Diesels use 40.6 gph. 2 x 525-hp Mercury Racing EFI Bravo III XR use 85.9 gph. The Bravos are faster, but some might go with the Volvos because of their fuel-sipping quality. 111% fuel savings! That's pretty darn impressive. http://www.boattest.com/Resources/vi...px?NewsID=2929 --Vic "111% fuel savings! That's pretty darn impressive." Did SW Tom do the math? I'm only asking because a fuel savings that high would seem to violate the laws of physics. 111% would mean the diesels create fuel. Now a 50% savings...that's impressive. I report. You decide. --Vic |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:57:30 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote: This link has the details, but I'll summarize. For those considering power options for the 400 Super Sport, these are revealing statistics at WOT. 2 x 370-hp Volvo Penta D6 Diesels use 40.6 gph. 2 x 525-hp Mercury Racing EFI Bravo III XR use 85.9 gph. The Bravos are faster, but some might go with the Volvos because of their fuel-sipping quality. 111% fuel savings! That's pretty darn impressive. This is meaningless unless you compare consumption at the same speed. Diesel is better than gas, of course. If you had a 525 hp diesels they would drink 57 GPH, two thirds as much as the gas engines. The gas engines in question seem thirsty, as gas engines go. Casady |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Turning Pig Poop into Boat Fuel | General | |||
And you think your boat gets bad fuel milage? | General | |||
how to get fuel stab into already winterized boat | General | |||
Boat Fuel Filter | General | |||
Express to Savings! | ASA |