wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:00 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:

Forget it Tim. They are not here to discuss any issues. They really
can't, but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
You've not provided one post in which you discussed any serious issue
cogently and in a civil manner. Therefore, there is no reason to engage
you and every reason to dismiss you.

Learn how to behave and demonstrate it, and I will consider engaging you
in an issues debate, one issue at a time. Copying and pasting not allowed.

Your deal.

Here, duck these questions. And if you don't understand them tell me
which parts you don't understand and maybe someone can help you out:

My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many
insults
and deflections you throw at me

Try again.


Once again, you have demonstrated you do not know how to behave in a
civil fashion in a debate.

On Oct 3, 12:20*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:00 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:

Forget it Tim. They are not here to discuss any issues. They really
can't, but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
You've not provided one post in which you discussed any serious issue
cogently and in a civil manner. Therefore, there is no reason to engage
you and every reason to dismiss you.

Learn how to behave and demonstrate it, and I will consider engaging you
in an issues debate, one issue at a time. Copying and pasting not allowed.

Your deal.

Here, duck these questions. And if you don't understand them tell me
which parts you don't understand and maybe someone can help you out:

My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many
insults
and deflections you throw at me

Try again.

Once again, you have demonstrated you do not know how to behave in a
civil fashion in a debate.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL is that you Harry?

On Oct 3, 12:31*pm, wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:20*pm, Boater wrote:





wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:00 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:

Forget it Tim. They are not here to discuss any issues. They really
can't, but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
You've not provided one post in which you discussed any serious issue
cogently and in a civil manner. Therefore, there is no reason to engage
you and every reason to dismiss you.

Learn how to behave and demonstrate it, and I will consider engaging you
in an issues debate, one issue at a time. Copying and pasting not allowed.

Your deal.

Here, duck these questions. And if you don't understand them tell me
which parts you don't understand and maybe someone can help you out:

My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many
insults
and deflections you throw at me

Try again.

Once again, you have demonstrated you do not know how to behave in a
civil fashion in a debate.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL *is that you Harry?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry the most foul mouthed, insulting, name calling piece of crap
here thinks someone else doesn't know how to act in a "civil
fashion"????? That's just so funny!!!!!!

On Oct 3, 12:15*pm, Boater wrote:

One more time...I'm not going to engage you in "debate" until you
demonstrate you can discuss issues cogently and in a civil manner.

Harry, I'd like to have a civil and cogent debate with you! I don't
believe your father got a fireboat welcome in NYC, and as a matter of
fact, I know for fact that he did not. Let's discuss.


In fact, I have a 300+ page printed notebook on the EFCA that I've read,
cover to cover.

Yet another lie.

I'm not sure why any of the issues you mentioned are on your hot plate.
They certainly don't affect you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The "issues" affect every American.

On Oct 3, 12:38*pm, wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:31*pm, wrote:





On Oct 3, 12:20*pm, Boater wrote:

wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:00 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:

Forget it Tim. They are not here to discuss any issues. They really
can't, but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
You've not provided one post in which you discussed any serious issue
cogently and in a civil manner. Therefore, there is no reason to engage
you and every reason to dismiss you.

Learn how to behave and demonstrate it, and I will consider engaging you
in an issues debate, one issue at a time. Copying and pasting not allowed.

Your deal.

Here, duck these questions. And if you don't understand them tell me
which parts you don't understand and maybe someone can help you out:

My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many
insults
and deflections you throw at me

Try again.

Once again, you have demonstrated you do not know how to behave in a
civil fashion in a debate.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

LOL *is that you Harry?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry the most foul mouthed, insulting, name calling piece of crap
here thinks someone else doesn't know how to act in a "civil
fashion"????? That's just so funny!!!!!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's a defence mechanism for him. It's his way of hiding the fact that
he never graduated High School and really can't keep up with everyday
Americans...

wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:38 pm, wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:31 pm, wrote:





On Oct 3, 12:20 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:00 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
Forget it Tim. They are not here to discuss any issues. They really
can't, but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
You've not provided one post in which you discussed any serious issue
cogently and in a civil manner. Therefore, there is no reason to engage
you and every reason to dismiss you.
Learn how to behave and demonstrate it, and I will consider engaging you
in an issues debate, one issue at a time. Copying and pasting not allowed.
Your deal.
Here, duck these questions. And if you don't understand them tell me
which parts you don't understand and maybe someone can help you out:
My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many
insults
and deflections you throw at me
Try again.
Once again, you have demonstrated you do not know how to behave in a
civil fashion in a debate.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
LOL is that you Harry?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Harry the most foul mouthed, insulting, name calling piece of crap
here thinks someone else doesn't know how to act in a "civil
fashion"????? That's just so funny!!!!!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's a defence mechanism for him. It's his way of hiding the fact that
he never graduated High School and really can't keep up with everyday
Americans...


See...I knew if you dove deep enough, you'd find your best "debating
partner," your buddy Loogy.

On Oct 3, 12:45*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:38 pm, wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:31 pm, wrote:

On Oct 3, 12:20 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:00 pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
Forget it Tim. They are not here to discuss any issues. They really
can't, but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
You've not provided one post in which you discussed any serious issue
cogently and in a civil manner. Therefore, there is no reason to engage
you and every reason to dismiss you.
Learn how to behave and demonstrate it, and I will consider engaging you
in an issues debate, one issue at a time. Copying and pasting not allowed.
Your deal.
Here, duck these questions. And if you don't understand them tell me
which parts you don't understand and maybe someone can help you out:
My questions were clear and consice.
Do you know what the "Fairness Doctrine" is?
Do you support it and why?
Are you familiar with the voter privacy union bill?
Do you support it and why?
If you can't answer or understand those questions, you have no
business trying to come across as informed, no matter how many
insults
and deflections you throw at me
Try again.
Once again, you have demonstrated you do not know how to behave in a
civil fashion in a debate.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
LOL *is that you Harry?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Harry the most foul mouthed, insulting, name calling piece of crap
here thinks someone else doesn't know how to act in a "civil
fashion"????? That's just so funny!!!!!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's a defence mechanism for him. It's his way of hiding the fact that
he never graduated High School and really can't keep up with everyday
Americans...

See...I knew if you dove deep enough, you'd find your best "debating
partner," your buddy Loogy.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well, he is a good honest American. You are just a mouthpiece without
the courage to engage anyone honestly..

"Boater" wrote in message
. ..
Tim wrote:
On Oct 3, 8:10 am, "Don White" wrote:

The scary thing is...she'd just be the figurehead...... faceless people
behind her wouldbe pulling her strings.
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -


Don, I always thought that was the way of politics.

Anybody up for conspiricy theories.

yeah, where's Larry?

?;^ )


I think Palin demonstrated last night that she'd be a great hostess on a
teevee "reality" show. She's soooooo bubbly...and empty-headed, she'd be
just perfect. Or maybe she could replace that mindless blonde bimbo
conservative on The View...

I used to think that 'Elizabeth' was cute when she was part of the 1st
Survivor program.
She hasn't aged well.

On Oct 3, 11:00*am, Boater wrote:
wrote:

but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.
Well, actually sott, I don't know a latte' from a madda hari.. so
anyone can have at it from that stand point.


Copying and pasting not allowed.

Your deal.


What Harry? no copy 'n pate allowed????

LOL!

On Oct 3, 1:54*pm, Tim wrote:
On Oct 3, 11:00*am, Boater wrote: wrote:

*but they will insult and dismiss you as you don't know how to
order a latte'.

Well, actually sott, I don't know a latte' from a madda hari.. *so
anyone can have at it from that stand point.



Copying and pasting not allowed.

Your deal.

What Harry? no copy 'n pate allowed????

LOL!

Doesn't matter, you live in a "flyover" state anyway