alephtull wrote:
Gunner wrote:
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:05:52 -0400, alephtull
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:37:53 -0400, alephtull
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:11:07 -0400, alephtull
wrote:

Gunner Asch wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:46:17 -0400, alephtull
wrote:

She is a ****ing religious nut. Anyone who's listened to her
talk thinks so, except for other religious nuts.
So what do you base your opinon on? A strong belief in God?

A belief in fairy tales about Adam and Eve over hard science.
Gee..then you think Liberals are nutcases too.
IF they take the Bible literally, yes.
Thats a pretty big If, isnt it? So Jesus didnt rise from the dead?
After all...its part of the Big Theology of Christianity. To be
Christian, you have to believe that bit of dogma. How about that
Virgin Birth thingy?

Or do you believe you are qualified to determine what Christians
should believe in, and what makes them nutcases?
The point you clearly already forgot, small brained one, is that
there is irrefutable proof of evolution ongoing. So people who choose
to believe in fairy tales in the face of irrefutable scientific proof
are in fact, deluded nuts in my book. If you wish to think of them as
rational people, that's your decision.

So Evolution is a scientific fact, rather than a theory?

There are the facts of evolution, and various theories about its mechanisms.

Odd..most reputable scientists disagree with you.

Odd, you have no clue what "most reputable scientists" think or know.
Not to mention most scientists are not biologists.

Dan