Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
JohnH wrote:
..
Why are you emulating Dottie Krause with the dots?


He can't come up with anything original??


I know that , Donnie. My question was why would John Want to emulate him?

wrote in message
...

Pssst, your lover/clone Harry does it. He isn't the originator of the
dot either.

--------------------------------------------------------------


Why do you have to go and say stuff like that all the time?
You're putting yourself in the company of undesirables like Ditzy Dan, etc.
I know you're a better man than that.

On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:23:21 -0400, Jim wrote:

JohnH wrote:
..
Why are you emulating Dottie Krause with the dots?

You got it backwards, but that's OK.
--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]

On Oct 14, 8:37*pm, Boater wrote:
...of the toilet turds are so angry these days:

"Poll Finds Attacks by McCain Turn Off Voters

Article Tools Sponsored By
By MICHAEL COOPER and MEGAN THEE
NY Times
Published: October 14, 2008

The McCain campaign’s recent angry tone and sharply personal attacks on
Senator Barack Obama appear to have backfired and tarnished Senator John
McCain more than their intended target, the latest New York Times/CBS
News poll has found.

After several weeks in which the McCain campaign unleashed a series of
strong political attacks on Mr. Obama, trying to tie him to a former
1960s radical, among other things, the poll found that more voters see
Mr. McCain as waging a negative campaign than Mr. Obama. Six in 10
voters surveyed said that Mr. McCain had spent more time attacking Mr.
Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same
number, voters said Mr. Obama was spending more of his time explaining
than attacking.

Over all, the poll found that if the election were held today, 53
percent of those determined to be probable voters said that they would
vote for Mr. Obama and 39 percent said they would vote for Mr. McCain.

- - -

Now, 53 to 39 means this is somewhat of an outlier, but it still
indicates the trend, which, 21 days from an election, is a nice indicator..

Yep...the conservatrashers seem headed for a flush...big time.

That's our allegedly tolerant Harry!

On Oct 14, 9:54*pm, Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 14, 8:37 pm, Boater wrote:
...of the toilet turds are so angry these days:

"Poll Finds Attacks by McCain Turn Off Voters

Article Tools Sponsored By
By MICHAEL COOPER and MEGAN THEE
NY Times
Published: October 14, 2008

The McCain campaign’s recent angry tone and sharply personal attacks on
Senator Barack Obama appear to have backfired and tarnished Senator John
McCain more than their intended target, the latest New York Times/CBS
News poll has found.

After several weeks in which the McCain campaign unleashed a series of
strong political attacks on Mr. Obama, trying to tie him to a former
1960s radical, among other things, the poll found that more voters see
Mr. McCain as waging a negative campaign than Mr. Obama. Six in 10
voters surveyed said that Mr. McCain had spent more time attacking Mr.
Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same
number, voters said Mr. Obama was spending more of his time explaining
than attacking.

Over all, the poll found that if the election were held today, 53
percent of those determined to be probable voters said that they would
vote for Mr. Obama and 39 percent said they would vote for Mr. McCain.

- - -

Now, 53 to 39 means this is somewhat of an outlier, but it still
indicates the trend, which, 21 days from an election, is a nice indicator.

Yep...the conservatrashers seem headed for a flush...big time.

Whoa, another angry rant by a conservative. *Those conservatives just
cannot stop the OT stuff can they?

Angry? I'm pleased.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry calling someone else "angry" when all he does here is spew
hatred, vugarities, name calling and lies.

wrote:
On Oct 14, 8:37 pm, Boater wrote:
...of the toilet turds are so angry these days:

"Poll Finds Attacks by McCain Turn Off Voters

Article Tools Sponsored By
By MICHAEL COOPER and MEGAN THEE
NY Times
Published: October 14, 2008

The McCain campaign’s recent angry tone and sharply personal attacks on
Senator Barack Obama appear to have backfired and tarnished Senator John
McCain more than their intended target, the latest New York Times/CBS
News poll has found.

After several weeks in which the McCain campaign unleashed a series of
strong political attacks on Mr. Obama, trying to tie him to a former
1960s radical, among other things, the poll found that more voters see
Mr. McCain as waging a negative campaign than Mr. Obama. Six in 10
voters surveyed said that Mr. McCain had spent more time attacking Mr.
Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same
number, voters said Mr. Obama was spending more of his time explaining
than attacking.

Over all, the poll found that if the election were held today, 53
percent of those determined to be probable voters said that they would
vote for Mr. Obama and 39 percent said they would vote for Mr. McCain.

- - -

Now, 53 to 39 means this is somewhat of an outlier, but it still
indicates the trend, which, 21 days from an election, is a nice indicator.

Yep...the conservatrashers seem headed for a flush...big time.

That's our allegedly tolerant Harry!


Considering the horrors inflicted on our country the last eight years by
the conservatrash, I have little tolerance for them. Note, however, that
I am not making a blanket statement about Republicans...just the
conservatrash among them, posters here like Herring, DK, BAR, Florida
Jim, et cetera...the mindless right-wing masses.

Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 14, 8:37 pm, Boater wrote:
...of the toilet turds are so angry these days:

"Poll Finds Attacks by McCain Turn Off Voters

Article Tools Sponsored By
By MICHAEL COOPER and MEGAN THEE
NY Times
Published: October 14, 2008

The McCain campaign’s recent angry tone and sharply personal attacks on
Senator Barack Obama appear to have backfired and tarnished Senator John
McCain more than their intended target, the latest New York Times/CBS
News poll has found.

After several weeks in which the McCain campaign unleashed a series of
strong political attacks on Mr. Obama, trying to tie him to a former
1960s radical, among other things, the poll found that more voters see
Mr. McCain as waging a negative campaign than Mr. Obama. Six in 10
voters surveyed said that Mr. McCain had spent more time attacking Mr.
Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same
number, voters said Mr. Obama was spending more of his time explaining
than attacking.

Over all, the poll found that if the election were held today, 53
percent of those determined to be probable voters said that they would
vote for Mr. Obama and 39 percent said they would vote for Mr. McCain.

- - -

Now, 53 to 39 means this is somewhat of an outlier, but it still
indicates the trend, which, 21 days from an election, is a nice
indicator.

Yep...the conservatrashers seem headed for a flush...big time.

That's our allegedly tolerant Harry!


Considering the horrors inflicted on our country the last eight years by
the conservatrash, I have little tolerance for them. Note, however, that
I am not making a blanket statement about Republicans...just the
conservatrash among them, posters here like Herring, DK, BAR, Florida
Jim, et cetera...the mindless right-wing masses.

As if your opinion matters. Sheesh WAFA

Jim wrote:
Boater wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 14, 8:37 pm, Boater wrote:
...of the toilet turds are so angry these days:

"Poll Finds Attacks by McCain Turn Off Voters

Article Tools Sponsored By
By MICHAEL COOPER and MEGAN THEE
NY Times
Published: October 14, 2008

The McCain campaign’s recent angry tone and sharply personal attacks on
Senator Barack Obama appear to have backfired and tarnished Senator
John
McCain more than their intended target, the latest New York Times/CBS
News poll has found.

After several weeks in which the McCain campaign unleashed a series of
strong political attacks on Mr. Obama, trying to tie him to a former
1960s radical, among other things, the poll found that more voters see
Mr. McCain as waging a negative campaign than Mr. Obama. Six in 10
voters surveyed said that Mr. McCain had spent more time attacking Mr.
Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same
number, voters said Mr. Obama was spending more of his time explaining
than attacking.

Over all, the poll found that if the election were held today, 53
percent of those determined to be probable voters said that they would
vote for Mr. Obama and 39 percent said they would vote for Mr. McCain.

- - -

Now, 53 to 39 means this is somewhat of an outlier, but it still
indicates the trend, which, 21 days from an election, is a nice
indicator.

Yep...the conservatrashers seem headed for a flush...big time.

That's our allegedly tolerant Harry!


Considering the horrors inflicted on our country the last eight years
by the conservatrash, I have little tolerance for them. Note, however,
that I am not making a blanket statement about Republicans...just the
conservatrash among them, posters here like Herring, DK, BAR, Florida
Jim, et cetera...the mindless right-wing masses.

As if your opinion matters. Sheesh WAFA


What are you disagreeing with here? The fact that the conservatrash
inflicted horrors on our country the last eight years or that you are
trash?

On Oct 15, 11:40*am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Pssst, your lover/clone Harry does it. He isn't the originator of the
dot either.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Why do you have to go and say stuff like that all the time?
You're putting yourself in the company of undesirables like Ditzy Dan, etc.
I know you're a better man than that.

Because Harry ISN'T the originator.

wrote in message
...
On Oct 15, 11:40 am, "Don White" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Pssst, your lover/clone Harry does it. He isn't the originator of the
dot either.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Why do you have to go and say stuff like that all the time?
You're putting yourself in the company of undesirables like Ditzy Dan,
etc.
I know you're a better man than that.

Because Harry ISN'T the originator.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

You know I'm talking about the "your lover/clone" business.