Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Boater wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Oct 19, 10:13 am, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain." As much as I admire him for his honesty, Powell has been mislead and wrong before. He's only human. Eisboch The American people were mislead by the Bush Campaign in 2000 and 2004. And Sec. Powell was part of the 2000, and 2004 Bush campaign so that also made him a misleader? I think it was pretty obvious that Powell did not agree with the current administration. Even before 2004. His leaving was no surprise to many. He stayed loyal to the party in spite of differences in opinion. A lot of retired generals are much more cautious about military actions that civilians. They know from experience that the cost is higher and the results more ellusive than the surface facts suggest. Clearly proven in this current mess. Frankly I hope Obama considers Powell for a return to public service. Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. Doubtful. It only had an impact on those who need others to decide for them who they should vote for and in that case most of that group will be voting for Nobama anyway. The Democratic base is very motivated. Powell's comments will help more non-aligned, independent and undecided voters go for Obama. This election is going to depend on turnout and independent and undecided voters. What Powell said will matter to some of those folks. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 20, 2:20*pm, Boater wrote:
JimH wrote: On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Boater wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .... On Oct 19, 10:13 am, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain." As much as I admire him for his honesty, Powell has been mislead and wrong before. He's only human. Eisboch The American people were mislead by the Bush Campaign in 2000 and 2004. And Sec. Powell was part of the 2000, and 2004 Bush campaign so that also made him a misleader? I think it was pretty obvious that Powell did not agree with the current administration. *Even before 2004. *His leaving was no surprise to many. *He stayed loyal to the party in spite of differences in opinion. *A lot of retired generals are much more cautious about military actions that civilians. *They know from experience that the cost is higher and the results more ellusive than the surface facts suggest. *Clearly proven in this current mess. *Frankly I hope Obama considers Powell for a return to public service. Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. Doubtful. *It only had an impact on those who need others to decide for them who they should vote for and in that case most of that group will be voting for Nobama anyway. The Democratic base is very motivated. Powell's comments will help more non-aligned, independent and undecided voters go for Obama. This election is going to depend on turnout and independent and undecided voters. What Powell said will matter to some of those folks. Perhaps, but his endorsement and comments yesterday were certainly not "absolutely devastating" to the McCain campaign as you suggest. If an endorsement sways a voter......that voter needs to visit the wizard in hopes of getting a brain. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
..
-- A Harry Krause truism: "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Narcissistic Hypocrite] |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boater" wrote in message ... Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. I don't think I've ever heard a more direct and erudite non-endorsement and endorsement of two candidates. And he still considers himself to be a Republican. Interesting, isn't it? Eisboch |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message ... Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. I don't think I've ever heard a more direct and erudite non-endorsement and endorsement of two candidates. And he still considers himself to be a Republican. Interesting, isn't it? Eisboch Tradition. Or perhaps he hopes his party will come to its senses if it is handed a catastrophic loss. A more moderate Republican party might be more successful in the future. But if it continues to run lousy candidates and almost totally negative campaigns, it deserves to lose and lose and lose. |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Boater wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Oct 19, 10:13 am, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain." As much as I admire him for his honesty, Powell has been mislead and wrong before. He's only human. Eisboch The American people were mislead by the Bush Campaign in 2000 and 2004. And Sec. Powell was part of the 2000, and 2004 Bush campaign so that also made him a misleader? I think it was pretty obvious that Powell did not agree with the current administration. Even before 2004. His leaving was no surprise to many. He stayed loyal to the party in spite of differences in opinion. A lot of retired generals are much more cautious about military actions that civilians. They know from experience that the cost is higher and the results more ellusive than the surface facts suggest. Clearly proven in this current mess. Frankly I hope Obama considers Powell for a return to public service. Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. Doubtful. It only had an impact on those who need others to decide for them who they should vote for and in that case most of that group will be voting for Nobama anyway. The endorsement of a newspaper or a public figure is a self serving act. Why would the older Powell wait until now to endorse Obama? The younger Powell has endorsed McCain. Both endorsements are irrelevant. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boater wrote:
JimH wrote: On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Boater wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Oct 19, 10:13 am, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain." As much as I admire him for his honesty, Powell has been mislead and wrong before. He's only human. Eisboch The American people were mislead by the Bush Campaign in 2000 and 2004. And Sec. Powell was part of the 2000, and 2004 Bush campaign so that also made him a misleader? I think it was pretty obvious that Powell did not agree with the current administration. Even before 2004. His leaving was no surprise to many. He stayed loyal to the party in spite of differences in opinion. A lot of retired generals are much more cautious about military actions that civilians. They know from experience that the cost is higher and the results more ellusive than the surface facts suggest. Clearly proven in this current mess. Frankly I hope Obama considers Powell for a return to public service. Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. Doubtful. It only had an impact on those who need others to decide for them who they should vote for and in that case most of that group will be voting for Nobama anyway. The Democratic base is very motivated. Powell's comments will help more non-aligned, independent and undecided voters go for Obama. This election is going to depend on turnout and independent and undecided voters. What Powell said will matter to some of those folks. Sheep shouldn't vote. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boater wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. I don't think I've ever heard a more direct and erudite non-endorsement and endorsement of two candidates. And he still considers himself to be a Republican. Interesting, isn't it? Eisboch Tradition. Or perhaps he hopes his party will come to its senses if it is handed a catastrophic loss. A more moderate Republican party might be more successful in the future. But if it continues to run lousy candidates and almost totally negative campaigns, it deserves to lose and lose and lose. The more the Democrats become liberal the more the loose the presidential elections. It seems that when the Democrats move to the right they win and when the Republicans move to the right they win. 1976 is an exception. |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
JimH wrote: On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Boater wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Oct 19, 10:13 am, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain." As much as I admire him for his honesty, Powell has been mislead and wrong before. He's only human. Eisboch The American people were mislead by the Bush Campaign in 2000 and 2004. And Sec. Powell was part of the 2000, and 2004 Bush campaign so that also made him a misleader? I think it was pretty obvious that Powell did not agree with the current administration. Even before 2004. His leaving was no surprise to many. He stayed loyal to the party in spite of differences in opinion. A lot of retired generals are much more cautious about military actions that civilians. They know from experience that the cost is higher and the results more ellusive than the surface facts suggest. Clearly proven in this current mess. Frankly I hope Obama considers Powell for a return to public service. Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. Doubtful. It only had an impact on those who need others to decide for them who they should vote for and in that case most of that group will be voting for Nobama anyway. The endorsement of a newspaper or a public figure is a self serving act. Why would the older Powell wait until now to endorse Obama? The younger Powell has endorsed McCain. Both endorsements are irrelevant. I'm glad to see the grapes of wrath are going to be so bitter this year for the "Base." |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote: JimH wrote: On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Boater wrote: jamesgangnc wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Oct 19, 10:13 am, Boater wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Boater" wrote in message ... "I think we need a transformational figure. I think we need a president who is a generational change and that's why I'm supporting Barack Obama, not out of any lack of respect or admiration for Sen. John McCain." As much as I admire him for his honesty, Powell has been mislead and wrong before. He's only human. Eisboch The American people were mislead by the Bush Campaign in 2000 and 2004. And Sec. Powell was part of the 2000, and 2004 Bush campaign so that also made him a misleader? I think it was pretty obvious that Powell did not agree with the current administration. Even before 2004. His leaving was no surprise to many. He stayed loyal to the party in spite of differences in opinion. A lot of retired generals are much more cautious about military actions that civilians. They know from experience that the cost is higher and the results more ellusive than the surface facts suggest. Clearly proven in this current mess. Frankly I hope Obama considers Powell for a return to public service. Powell's comments yesterday, both on Meet the Press and afterwards, were absolutely devastating to the McCain campaign. Doubtful. It only had an impact on those who need others to decide for them who they should vote for and in that case most of that group will be voting for Nobama anyway. The Democratic base is very motivated. Powell's comments will help more non-aligned, independent and undecided voters go for Obama. This election is going to depend on turnout and independent and undecided voters. What Powell said will matter to some of those folks. Sheep shouldn't vote. Awwwwwww...poor baser. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
First Endorsement of a Dem for Pres in 72 Years | General | |||
Colin Archer design | General | |||
Colin Archer design | Boat Building | |||
Dean to get major endorsement? | General |