On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:33:35 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:22:15 -0400, JimH wrote:



I'm not a lib, and I liked Sarah's "coming out" speech.
I saw her positive values, and was willing to give her a chance.
Thought McCain might have struck a brilliant stroke.
She had her chance to say something intelligent, and show she
can actually think.
She can't.
Nothing but the same bull**** talking points over and over and over
and over and over.
She's basically brain dead in regards to thinking and being a problem
solver.
And I think McCain is too. Same old bull**** over and over and over.
Too bad.
Republicans might have had a better chance with Huckabee or Romney,
who are both smarter than John "Barry Goldwater" McCain.
I liked Huckabee. Most decent guy of them all.

--Vic

Sarah is not braindead and is not running at the top of the ticket.

How is Obama more experienced to be POTUS than Palin (who is running
as VP)?

Hey, nobody is experienced at being Prez until it happens.
I don't care about that. They can recruit experienced brains.
But if McCain keels over I'd have to listen to her nagging for four
years.
That wouldn't be prudent.

--Vic


sigh Let me ask you a differnt way........How is Palin less
less experienced than Obama?

Vic Smith wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:52:24 -0400, JimH wrote:


Why the libs are making a deal of Sarah's experience is beyond me
considering that she has more executive experience than Nobama
has.......and Nobama is the one running at the top of the ticket.

I'm not a lib, and I liked Sarah's "coming out" speech.
I saw her positive values, and was willing to give her a chance.
Thought McCain might have struck a brilliant stroke.
She had her chance to say something intelligent, and show she
can actually think.
She can't.
Nothing but the same bull**** talking points over and over and over
and over and over.
She's basically brain dead in regards to thinking and being a problem
solver.
And I think McCain is too. Same old bull**** over and over and over.
Too bad.
Republicans might have had a better chance with Huckabee or Romney,
who are both smarter than John "Barry Goldwater" McCain.
I liked Huckabee. Most decent guy of them all.

--Vic


I thought Palin did a good job reading off the teleprompter at the
Republican convention.

That being said, she is an absolute ditz. And almost everything the
Republicans have claimed about her has turned out to be bullschitt.

I loved her comments about what she thinks the role of the VP is...she
thinks if elected she'll be Senate Majority Leader. She has no
understanding of the Constitutional role of the VP.

The Wall Street Journal, a right-leaning newspaper, released a poll
today in which it was revealed that 55% of the populace does not believe
Palin has what it takes to be VP.

McCain exercised poor judgment in picking Palin.

JimH wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:33:35 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:22:15 -0400, JimH wrote:


I'm not a lib, and I liked Sarah's "coming out" speech.
I saw her positive values, and was willing to give her a chance.
Thought McCain might have struck a brilliant stroke.
She had her chance to say something intelligent, and show she
can actually think.
She can't.
Nothing but the same bull**** talking points over and over and over
and over and over.
She's basically brain dead in regards to thinking and being a problem
solver.
And I think McCain is too. Same old bull**** over and over and over.
Too bad.
Republicans might have had a better chance with Huckabee or Romney,
who are both smarter than John "Barry Goldwater" McCain.
I liked Huckabee. Most decent guy of them all.

--Vic
Sarah is not braindead and is not running at the top of the ticket.

How is Obama more experienced to be POTUS than Palin (who is running
as VP)?
Hey, nobody is experienced at being Prez until it happens.
I don't care about that. They can recruit experienced brains.
But if McCain keels over I'd have to listen to her nagging for four
years.
That wouldn't be prudent.

--Vic


sigh Let me ask you a differnt way........How is Palin less
less experienced than Obama?


Obama has wisdom and judgment. Palin has...nothing.

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:40:22 -0400, JimH wrote:


Hey, nobody is experienced at being Prez until it happens.
I don't care about that. They can recruit experienced brains.
But if McCain keels over I'd have to listen to her nagging for four
years.
That wouldn't be prudent.

--Vic


sigh Let me ask you a differnt way........How is Palin less
less experienced than Obama?

What, you getting political on me?
I said above I don't care, and that NOBODY is experienced at being
Prez. OJT.
To keep you happy, I'll say Palin has much more experience at being
President.
But keep in mind the nagging is the important part.

--Vic

"Boater" wrote in message
...


Obama has wisdom and judgment.

Obama has ...... plans .....


Eisboch

On Oct 22, 7:58*pm, Boater wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:33:35 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:22:15 -0400, JimH wrote:

I'm not a lib, and I liked Sarah's "coming out" speech.
I saw her positive values, and was willing to give her a chance.
Thought McCain might have struck a brilliant stroke.
She had her chance to say something intelligent, and show she
can actually think.
She can't.
Nothing but the same bull**** talking points over and over and over
and over and over.
She's basically brain dead in regards to thinking and being a problem
solver.
And I think McCain is too. *Same old bull**** over and over and over.
Too bad.
Republicans might have had a better chance with Huckabee or Romney,
who are both smarter than John "Barry Goldwater" McCain.
I liked Huckabee. *Most decent guy of them all.

--Vic
Sarah is not braindead and is not running at the top of the ticket.

How is Obama more experienced to be POTUS than Palin (who is running
as VP)?
Hey, nobody is experienced at being Prez until it happens.
I don't care about that. *They can recruit experienced brains.
But if McCain keels over I'd have to listen to her nagging for four
years.
That wouldn't be prudent.

--Vic

sigh * * * Let me ask you a differnt way........How is Palin *less
less experienced than Obama?

Obama has wisdom and judgment. Palin has...nothing.

What a bunch of BS.

Besides.......Palin is not running for POTUS.

On Oct 22, 8:03*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message

...



Obama has wisdom and judgment.

Obama has ...... *plans .....

Eisboch

Actually.....he has ideas and promises with no idea how to fund and/or
implement them.

The ignorant (his base) buy into it.

"JimH" wrote in message
...
On Oct 22, 8:03 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message

...



Obama has wisdom and judgment.

Obama has ...... plans .....

Eisboch

Actually.....he has ideas and promises with no idea how to fund and/or
implement them.

The ignorant (his base) buy into it.
------------------------------------

He has "other" plans.

Eisboch

On Oct 22, 9:15*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message

...
On Oct 22, 8:03 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Boater" wrote in message

...

Obama has wisdom and judgment.

Obama has ...... plans .....

Eisboch

Actually.....he has ideas and promises with no idea how to fund and/or
implement them.

The ignorant (his base) buy into it.
------------------------------------

He has "other" plans.

Eisboch

What's funny is hearing Harry talking about someone working for a
living

On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:58:58 -0400, Boater wrote:



Obama has wisdom and judgment. Palin has...nothing.

That deserves a reply...






--
A Harry Krause truism:

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Narcissistic Hypocrite]