Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 06:14:17 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

McCain is running the dirtiest campaign since Nixon's CREEP. That
is not the fault of Obama or his ability to raise campaign funds.

You keep saying that, yet many of your contemporaries, like Chris
Mathews, are expressing amazement that McCain didn't get down and
dirty with Obama, particularly on the Rev. Wright issue.

No, McCain didn't run a particularly dirty campaign. Some of his
supporters in isolated areas did some stupid things, but so did
Obama's. Neither have leashes on everyone.

You have the habit and style of repeating things over and over until
they become facts in your mind. So do many of the third string
pundits.

Eisboch


You're not living in a contested state or next to one. I do. I see
lots of McCain television commercials you do not. All McCain does is
attack-attack-attack. Dirty.

I live *in * the state to which you refer, and I find your assertions
full
of crap.


You're looking inward again.

All of the commercials John H sees, Harry and I see too.

Harry, what do you think about Obama bankrupting the coal industry and
putting all of those union coal miners out of work?

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 06:14:17 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

McCain is running the dirtiest campaign since Nixon's CREEP. That
is not the fault of Obama or his ability to raise campaign funds.

You keep saying that, yet many of your contemporaries, like Chris
Mathews, are expressing amazement that McCain didn't get down and
dirty with Obama, particularly on the Rev. Wright issue.

No, McCain didn't run a particularly dirty campaign. Some of his
supporters in isolated areas did some stupid things, but so did
Obama's. Neither have leashes on everyone.

You have the habit and style of repeating things over and over
until they become facts in your mind. So do many of the third
string pundits.

Eisboch


You're not living in a contested state or next to one. I do. I see
lots of McCain television commercials you do not. All McCain does is
attack-attack-attack. Dirty.

I live *in * the state to which you refer, and I find your
assertions full
of crap.


You're looking inward again.

All of the commercials John H sees, Harry and I see too.

Harry, what do you think about Obama bankrupting the coal industry and
putting all of those union coal miners out of work?


Is that what the corporate bankruptcy filings say?

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 06:14:17 -0500, Boater
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

McCain is running the dirtiest campaign since Nixon's CREEP. That
is not the fault of Obama or his ability to raise campaign funds.

You keep saying that, yet many of your contemporaries, like Chris
Mathews, are expressing amazement that McCain didn't get down and
dirty with Obama, particularly on the Rev. Wright issue.

No, McCain didn't run a particularly dirty campaign. Some of his
supporters in isolated areas did some stupid things, but so did
Obama's. Neither have leashes on everyone.

You have the habit and style of repeating things over and over
until they become facts in your mind. So do many of the third
string pundits.

Eisboch


You're not living in a contested state or next to one. I do. I see
lots of McCain television commercials you do not. All McCain does is
attack-attack-attack. Dirty.

I live *in * the state to which you refer, and I find your
assertions full
of crap.


You're looking inward again.

All of the commercials John H sees, Harry and I see too.

Harry, what do you think about Obama bankrupting the coal industry and
putting all of those union coal miners out of work?

Does "that one" really have visions of breaking unions? well, I guess if
he is bent on doing it, he can make it happen. That would be a major
"CHANGE"