53-42
 

53-42
 

BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

53-42
 

"Boater" wrote in message
...


Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?



Sad that anyone who has questions or reservations about *your* candidate is
automatically a dipschitt.

Eisboch

53-42
 

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you
do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.

53-42
 

Eisboch wrote:
"Boater" wrote in message
...

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?



Sad that anyone who has questions or reservations about *your* candidate is
automatically a dipschitt.

Eisboch



I don't know of one reason why the Obama campaign should expend energy
to satisfy the curiosity of those who would not vote for him under any
circumstances. If some rightie has *proof* Obama was not born in Hawaii,
let him come forward with it. Proof, mind you, not speculation.

I don't recall referring to you as a dipschitt.

53-42
 

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu.
I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama
hasn't let this information be released. In the best case it would
put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the
charges that Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out.
What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to run for the
presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy
of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout
of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate
of live birth.

53-42
 

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says
he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu.
I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama
hasn't let this information be released. In the best case it would
put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the
charges that Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out.
What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to run for the
presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if
the right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true
copy of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a
printout of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his certificate
of live birth.

The fact that a requirement to be President of the United States of
America shall be a natural born citizen of the United States.

Would it bother you if there were questions surrounding the birth of a
Republican?

53-42
 

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week
ago. Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful
history. He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the
9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"?
Only the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he
says he is, an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in
Honolulu. I can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and
up, Obama hasn't let this information be released. In the best case
it would put all of this talk to rest. But, if there is some
validity to the charges that Obama is hiding something then it is
going to come out. What do you do with a guy who committed fraud to
run for the presidency? What do you do with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if
the right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true
copy of the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a
printout of the information stored in an electronic database.


I doubt Obama gives a schitt about what you want in his
certificate of live birth.

The fact that a requirement to be President of the United States of
America shall be a natural born citizen of the United States.

Would it bother you if there were questions surrounding the birth of a
Republican?


Indeed, I could never figure out how George H.W. Bush could have a son
as bright as Jeb and one as dull as George W. Different parents?

53-42
 

"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history.
He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?

Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.

It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?

Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?

Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy of
the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout of
the information stored in an electronic database.

So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html

53-42
 

D.Duck wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:29:19 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


If you are talking about the Berg suit, it was dismissed a week ago.
Not to shoot the messenger, but Berg does have a colorful history.
He
sued Bush under RICO statutes, suggesting prior knowledge of the 9/11
attacks. By the by, Obama has produced a Birth Certificate from
Hawaii.
The birth certificate is questionable and what about education and
medical records?
Grasping at straws, or do you think he's some sort of "sleeper"? Only
the truly paranoid would think he is anything but what he says he is,
an American citizen born in Hawaii.
It can all be cleared up the registrar of vital records in Honolulu. I
can't figure out why, if everything is on the up and up, Obama hasn't
let this information be released. In the best case it would put all of
this talk to rest. But, if there is some validity to the charges that
Obama is hiding something then it is going to come out. What do you do
with a guy who committed fraud to run for the presidency? What do you do
with his running mate?
Prove he wasn't born in Hawaii, dipschitt. And who really cares if the
right-wing dipschitts are "up in arms" over this, anyway?
Obama can clear up the question all by himself by releasing a true copy of
the record stored at Hawaii's vital records division. Not a printout of
the information stored in an electronic database.

So far this one has convinced me.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2...n_the_usa.html




Again, I see no reason to supply this sort of information to those who
would not vote for Obama under any circumstances. Screw 'em.