53-42
 

"BAR" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:39:58 -0800, Tim wrote:


If Barry O is elected POTUS, and after it was taken through the process
of the Supreme Court ; it was found out that he was not a natural born
U.S citizen.... what would happen? Would he be forced to resign the
Presidency due to fraud, withholding evidence and/or obstruction of
justice?

I think you may be missing the point. If he is elected, he will be
elected by the *people*. Any messing with that is called a coup. The
courts have consistently maintained a hands off approach to this issue,
as they should. I would also point out, this does not only concern
Obama, it also concerns McCain. McCain's "natural born" status is not a
certainty. Let's make it easy on ourselves, let the voters decide.

http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheor...el-j-chin.html

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...act_id=1157621

If you are born of US citizens in a local hospital in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

If you are born of US citizens in a US embassy in France are you a natural
born US citizen?


The 1790 Congress, many of whose members had been members of the
Constitutional Convention, provided in the Naturalization Act of 1790 that
"And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond
the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as
natural born citizens." In addition George Washington was president of the
Constitutional Convention and President of the United States when this bill
became law. If Washington disagreed with this definition, he could have
vetoed this bill.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen

53-42
 

D.Duck wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:39:58 -0800, Tim wrote:


If Barry O is elected POTUS, and after it was taken through the process
of the Supreme Court ; it was found out that he was not a natural born
U.S citizen.... what would happen? Would he be forced to resign the
Presidency due to fraud, withholding evidence and/or obstruction of
justice?
I think you may be missing the point. If he is elected, he will be
elected by the *people*. Any messing with that is called a coup. The
courts have consistently maintained a hands off approach to this issue,
as they should. I would also point out, this does not only concern
Obama, it also concerns McCain. McCain's "natural born" status is not a
certainty. Let's make it easy on ourselves, let the voters decide.

http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheor...el-j-chin.html

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...act_id=1157621
If you are born of US citizens in a local hospital in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

If you are born of US citizens in a US embassy in France are you a natural
born US citizen?


The 1790 Congress, many of whose members had been members of the
Constitutional Convention, provided in the Naturalization Act of 1790 that
"And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond
the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as
natural born citizens." In addition George Washington was president of the
Constitutional Convention and President of the United States when this bill
became law. If Washington disagreed with this definition, he could have
vetoed this bill.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen




Gosharoonie, that means that Obama, even if he were born in Kenya of a
mom who was a U.S. citizen is...a natural born citizen...

snerk

53-42
 

"Boater" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...
wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:39:58 -0800, Tim wrote:


If Barry O is elected POTUS, and after it was taken through the
process
of the Supreme Court ; it was found out that he was not a natural
born
U.S citizen.... what would happen? Would he be forced to resign the
Presidency due to fraud, withholding evidence and/or obstruction of
justice?
I think you may be missing the point. If he is elected, he will be
elected by the *people*. Any messing with that is called a coup. The
courts have consistently maintained a hands off approach to this issue,
as they should. I would also point out, this does not only concern
Obama, it also concerns McCain. McCain's "natural born" status is not
a certainty. Let's make it easy on ourselves, let the voters decide.

http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheor...el-j-chin.html

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.c...act_id=1157621
If you are born of US citizens in a local hospital in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

If you are born of US citizens in a US embassy in France are you a
natural born US citizen?


The 1790 Congress, many of whose members had been members of the
Constitutional Convention, provided in the Naturalization Act of 1790
that "And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born
beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be
considered as natural born citizens." In addition George Washington was
president of the Constitutional Convention and President of the United
States when this bill became law. If Washington disagreed with this
definition, he could have vetoed this bill.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen


Gosharoonie, that means that Obama, even if he were born in Kenya of a mom
who was a U.S. citizen is...a natural born citizen...

snerk

Not quite. "And the children of citizens of the United States that may be
born beyond the sea..."

It reads children of citizens, plural.

53-42
 

On Nov 4, 7:10*am, wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:57:32 -0500, BAR wrote:
http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheor...el-j-chin.html
If you are born of US citizens in a local hospital in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

If you are born of US citizens in a US embassy in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

Read the above link. *There are complex legal issues involved. *And you
think I'm going to answer either of the above questions? *No way.

Yes, there are complex legal issues involved, And no, I don't believe
I'm missing the point. My question[s], even though hypothetical would
or at least should have a concrete answer.

53-42
 

On Nov 4, 7:16*am, Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?

Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof..

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination
in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.

Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Harry, Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have had
their place of birth questioned, and if so those who haven't provided
"proof"

53-42
 

wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:57:32 -0500, BAR wrote:


http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheor...el-j-chin.html

If you are born of US citizens in a local hospital in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

If you are born of US citizens in a US embassy in France are you a
natural born US citizen?

Read the above link. There are complex legal issues involved. And you
think I'm going to answer either of the above questions? No way.

One occurs on US soil and one does not.

53-42
 

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the
nomination in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the
words any way you want.


Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."

The question on the table is where was Obama born? All we want to see is
a copy of his original birth certificate, not a printout from a database.

53-42
 

On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:27:17 -0500, D.Duck wrote:


It reads children of citizens, plural.

Yeah, but that's been updated.

" When one parent was a US citizen and the other a foreign national, the
US citizen parent must have resided in the US for a total of 10 years
prior to the birth of the child, with five of the years after the age of
14. An exception for people serving in the military was created by
considering time spent outside the US on military duty as time spent in
the US."

From:
http://www.visalaw.com/01mar2/12mar201.html

But then, apparently, Obama's Mom was young when she had him. So,
there's a question about the five years after the age of 14.

This stuff will give you a headache.

53-42
 

Tim wrote:
On Nov 4, 7:16 am, Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.
There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.
There is, eh? Got cites?
Article II, Section 1.
Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.
Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination
in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.
What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.
Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Harry, Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have had
their place of birth questioned, and if so those who haven't provided
"proof"


Questioned by who?

Right-wing droolers? Who cares?

53-42
 

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born
citizen of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an
implied requirement that you provide proof that you meet the
requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell
Weicker, a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the
nomination in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the
words any way you want.


Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."

The question on the table is where was Obama born? All we want to see is
a copy of his original birth certificate, not a printout from a database.


No one cares what you want. Try getting used to that, eh?