Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation
you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen of
the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation
you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen of
the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker, a
U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination in
1980. He was a born abroad, too.

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the documentation
you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker, a
U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination in
1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination
in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.


Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."

On Nov 4, 7:16*am, Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?

Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof..

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination
in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.

Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Harry, Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have had
their place of birth questioned, and if so those who haven't provided
"proof"

Tim wrote:
On Nov 4, 7:16 am, Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.
There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.
There is, eh? Got cites?
Article II, Section 1.
Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.
Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the nomination
in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.
What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the words
any way you want.
Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Harry, Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have had
their place of birth questioned, and if so those who haven't provided
"proof"


Questioned by who?

Right-wing droolers? Who cares?

On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:39:05 -0800, Tim wrote:


Harry, Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have had
their place of birth questioned, and if so those who haven't provided
"proof"

Chester Arthur. Many believe he was born in Canada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chester..._and_education

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born citizen
of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an implied
requirement that you provide proof that you meet the requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell Weicker,
a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the
nomination in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the
words any way you want.


Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."

The question on the table is where was Obama born? All we want to see is
a copy of his original birth certificate, not a printout from a database.

BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born
citizen of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is an
implied requirement that you provide proof that you meet the
requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was a
citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell
Weicker, a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for the
nomination in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the
words any way you want.


Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."

The question on the table is where was Obama born? All we want to see is
a copy of his original birth certificate, not a printout from a database.


No one cares what you want. Try getting used to that, eh?

Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:
Boater wrote:
BAR wrote:

There is no Constitutional requirement to provide the
documentation you want.

There is a Constitutional requirement to be a natural born
citizen of the US of A to be the President. Therefore there is
an implied requirement that you provide proof that you meet the
requirement.

There is, eh? Got cites?


Article II, Section 1.

Wrong, Palin-breath. There's not a word in there about providing
proof.

Further, there are questions over the term "natural born." George
Romney, for example, sought his party's nomination in 1968. He was
a citizen of the United States born abroad (in Mexico). Lowell
Weicker, a U.S. Senator from my home state, made a brief run for
the nomination in 1980. He was a born abroad, too.

What's your point? Article II, Section 1 states the requirement.
Implicit in the requirement is providing proof. You can parse the
words any way you want.


Yeah? Please provide us with a list of those Presidents who have
provided "proof."

The question on the table is where was Obama born? All we want to see
is a copy of his original birth certificate, not a printout from a
database.


No one cares what you want. Try getting used to that, eh?

If no one cares what I want, why do you keep responding to my posts?