Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know it's political, EVERYTHING is political. Whether in my
bicycles--that go unused--or my kayaks--that now will go unused--I feel at the bottom end of the food chain. Polluting SUVs and motorboats have it all; bikers and kayakers, get the scraps--if any. Whether we are intimidated or regulated, we face the beast. It's a jungle out there... Where's the law? Things get more difficult all the time... Beautiful day for kayaking. Perfect where I live, since I live here, in a wild place, mostly because I can walk to the bay, barely one block away. So I just walked my kayak there until I heard someone--the park guard--screaming. "No kayaks here!" "Why!?" I said. "Well, regulations," he barked back. "But is there any law?" I insisted. He informed me that the Parks Department doesn't want any legal suit from people hurting themselves on the rocks... According to that logic, the medical profession would be banned because you can bring suits against doctors... And then I asked him if he didn't do anything about a homeless couple near us, a common sight at the park. He challenged me, "do they bother you?" And I say they don't bother me in quickly passing through the park, but they sure scare the average family. In effect, most of our parks remain no man's land. Anyway I didn't take "no" for an answer, and I had him call the police. But, of course, lion helps lion, and I was almost swallowed. And they say they serve the community... I asked them why they don't take care of the homeless in the park, and they anwered back that that was a different issue. Thinking to myself, "shouldn't the issue be a clean, safe park?" And then I asked, "where's the law that prevents me from launching a kayak at this park?" They clued me in there's no law, only the law of the guard, and roared at me to get lost at once or else... And I say, I know that law, THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE... NOTE: I called the Parks Department later and they confirmed the prohibition. So a member of the community trying to have fun out there is restricted by the "law"; the homeless though got the law on their side. Where's the law? *** THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE Once upon a time, in the deep jungle, lived a Lion and a Monkey... One day the Monkey, tired of the Lion always taking the LION'S SHARE, and seeing that such injustice represented a danger to all the species of the jungle, demanded JUSTICE... The Lion, yawning and stretching, said, "You would have to have paws and sharp teeth..." Then the Monkey, who was very clever, devised a plan: He would go to the costume store, and look like a lion... When the Lion saw him, noticing that the new lion wasn't a match for him, and fearing COMPETITION, killed him on the spot --before the indifferent look of the little animals of the jungle... And that's how the Law of the Jungle was re-established one more time... NOTE: Other monkeys survived him... http://committed.to/justiceforpeace |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 21 Nov 2004 07:40:13 -0800, (DonQuijote1954) wrote: I know it's political, EVERYTHING is political. Whether in my bicycles--that go unused--or my kayaks--that now will go unused--I feel at the bottom end of the food chain. Polluting SUVs and motorboats have it all; bikers and kayakers, get the scraps--if any. Whether we are intimidated or regulated, we face the beast. It's a jungle out there... Where's the law? Things get more difficult all the time... Beautiful day for kayaking. Perfect where I live, since I live here, in a wild place, mostly because I can walk to the bay, barely one block away. So I just walked my kayak there until I heard someone--the park guard--screaming. "No kayaks here!" "Why!?" I said. "Well, regulations," he barked back. "But is there any law?" I insisted. He informed me that the Parks Department doesn't want any legal suit from people hurting themselves on the rocks... According to that logic, the medical profession would be banned because you can bring suits against doctors... And then I asked him if he didn't do anything about a homeless couple near us, a common sight at the park. He challenged me, "do they bother you?" And I say they don't bother me in quickly passing through the park, but they sure scare the average family. In effect, most of our parks remain no man's land. Anyway I didn't take "no" for an answer, and I had him call the police. But, of course, lion helps lion, and I was almost swallowed. And they say they serve the community... I asked them why they don't take care of the homeless in the park, and they anwered back that that was a different issue. Thinking to myself, "shouldn't the issue be a clean, safe park?" And then I asked, "where's the law that prevents me from launching a kayak at this park?" They clued me in there's no law, only the law of the guard, and roared at me to get lost at once or else... And I say, I know that law, THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE... NOTE: I called the Parks Department later and they confirmed the prohibition. So a member of the community trying to have fun out there is restricted by the "law"; the homeless though got the law on their side. Where's the law? *** THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE Once upon a time, in the deep jungle, lived a Lion and a Monkey... One day the Monkey, tired of the Lion always taking the LION'S SHARE, and seeing that such injustice represented a danger to all the species of the jungle, demanded JUSTICE... The Lion, yawning and stretching, said, "You would have to have paws and sharp teeth..." Then the Monkey, who was very clever, devised a plan: He would go to the costume store, and look like a lion... When the Lion saw him, noticing that the new lion wasn't a match for him, and fearing COMPETITION, killed him on the spot --before the indifferent look of the little animals of the jungle... And that's how the Law of the Jungle was re-established one more time... NOTE: Other monkeys survived him... http://committed.to/justiceforpeace Dude, it's a stupid park with a stupid rule. Get some perspective and start lobbying. Call your state legislator he lives close. Try to sound unstoned and persuasive. Ron |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ronsonic wrote in message . ..
Dude, it's a stupid park with a stupid rule. Get some perspective and start lobbying. Call your state legislator he lives close. Try to sound unstoned and persuasive. Ron Thanks all. Or else move. I got no patience to deal with the foxes... It's ironic that whether bicycling or kayaking you ALWAYS find yourself at the wrong end of the food chain for doing WHAT'S RIGHT. I grew political out of necessity and now only hope a revolution of some sort will come from the sky. Hallelujah!!! ![]() "It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." -Charles Darwin EVOLVE OR ELSE! Once upon a time lived a race of dinosaurs whose violence and appetite alarmed everybody... One day a Little Ant, tired of feeling stepped upon, and worried about her cooperative enterprise, came up to the Americanus Raptor--the biggest dinosaur of them all--and asked: "Why you eat and eat everything in your path? Why don't you slim down? Why can't we little animals at least have our own way?" Then the dinosaur, blowing the Little Ant away, shouted: "Bigger is better, so get lost!" The Little Ant, then, gathered the whole cooperative and said: "Comrades, our world is being threatened by the dinosaurs, so..." And at that precise moment the Earth was hit by a big ball of fire, destroying all but the small animals... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DonQuijote1954 wrote:
I know it's political, EVERYTHING is political. Whether in my bicycles--that go unused--or my kayaks--that now will go unused--I feel at the bottom end of the food chain. Polluting SUVs and motorboats have it all; bikers and kayakers, get the scraps--if any. Whether we are intimidated or regulated, we face the beast. It's a jungle out there... And what would you like done with the homeless? Have them scooped up and dispatched to some burnt out industrial district so they can't make the yuppies nervous when they go for strolls in the park? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jacobe Hazzard" wrote in message
... DonQuijote1954 wrote: I know it's political, EVERYTHING is political. Whether in my bicycles--that go unused--or my kayaks--that now will go unused--I feel at the bottom end of the food chain. Polluting SUVs and motorboats have it all; bikers and kayakers, get the scraps--if any. Whether we are intimidated or regulated, we face the beast. It's a jungle out there... And what would you like done with the homeless? Have them scooped up and dispatched to some burnt out industrial district so they can't make the yuppies nervous when they go for strolls in the park? Two words: HOMELESS SHELTER |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Felsenmeer wrote:
And what would you like done with the homeless? Have them scooped up and dispatched to some burnt out industrial district so they can't make the yuppies nervous when they go for strolls in the park? Two words: HOMELESS SHELTER OK so we lock them away in 'shelters' from which they are not free to leave. That's f***ing brilliant. My point was the OPs apparent hypocrisy in being outraged about kayaking being banned as 'potentially dangerous' and in the same breath condemning the homeless as 'potentially threatening'. The fact is, a park is a much nicer place to be than a homeless shelter. Have you ever seen the inside of one? My reading of his arguments (which really needn't have involved the homeless at all, as they were irrelevant to his kayaking problem) was a sort of juvenille, "If I can't play here then why should they?" How can he demand respect for people who go without motor vehicles, for whatever personal reasons they have, if he's completely unable to respect people who go without homes for their own personal reasons? It's easy to see how the most common complaints one might have about the homeless (IE they're dirt poor, are probably crazy and are homeless because they can't manage a real lifestyle, they're an inconvenience and a hazard to the rest of us) could easily be applied to a cyclist by a motorist. And if we can say nothing else for homelessness, we can be sure it has less environmental impact than owning a home, even a home with no SUVs. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() And what would you like done with the homeless? Have them scooped up and dispatched to some burnt out industrial district so they can't make the yuppies nervous when they go for strolls in the park? Two words: HOMELESS SHELTER OK so we lock them away in 'shelters' from which they are not free to leave. That's f***ing brilliant. I have yet to see a homeless shelter in which the homeless are "locked away" and are "not free to leave." Do these exist in your country? They don't in mine. My point was the OPs apparent hypocrisy in being outraged about kayaking being banned as 'potentially dangerous' and in the same breath condemning the homeless as 'potentially threatening'. The fact is, a park is a much nicer place to be than a homeless shelter. Have you ever seen the inside of one? My reading of his arguments (which really needn't have involved the homeless at all, as they were irrelevant to his kayaking problem) was a sort of juvenille, "If I can't play here then why should they?" The public in general *does* feel uncomfortable with homeless people, warranted or not. A park may be a much nicer place than a shelter to a homeless person, but a park is *not* a nicer place for the public when it becomes a collecting point for the homeless. You obviously have some sort of thing for the homeless, and that's good. But I think if you're going to intellectually honest, you're going to have to realize that the public at large in general does not approve of having their parks turned into impromptu homeless shelters. So... you've missed the point. People typically feel somewhat threatened by the homeless, yet they have free rein of the place. People do *not* typically feel threatened by sea kayakers, yet they're prohibited. This makes no sense. It's not an issue of "play." It's easy to see how the most common complaints one might have about the homeless (IE they're dirt poor, are probably crazy and are homeless because they can't manage a real lifestyle, they're an inconvenience and a hazard to the rest of us) could easily be applied to a cyclist by a motorist. Huh? That's silly hyperbole. Unless, of course, you truly believe that bicyclists are dirt poor, crazy, and can't manage a real lifestyle. And if we can say nothing else for homelessness, we can be sure it has less environmental impact than owning a home, even a home with no SUVs. What does this have to do with the whole thing? Within the context of this thread, where does the environmental impact of homelessness come into play? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Miami Parks hostile to kayakers | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Ontario Camping Fees | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Over nite parking in WA State parks | Cruising |